Jump to content
SAU Community

It's what we all already knew - speed cameras don't save lives! (Research)


Recommended Posts

A slow road to safety

Alan Buckingham

749 words

17 October 2003

Herald-Sun

1 - FIRST

21

English

© 2003 Herald and Weekly Times Limited

EXCESSIVE speed is involved in at least one-third of fatal accidents, according to a recent New South Wales Road Traffic Authority report.

So, sickened by the needless death on our roads, governments across Australia are taking action to reduce the death toll by lowering speeds.

And in some states, speed cameras have been handed a central role in ridding the roads of the speed menace.

But these policies are misconceived.

There is no simple relationship between speed and death and speed cameras aren't saving lives.

Australia's roads are not the dangerous places they are often portrayed to be.

Between 1980 and 2002 there has been a 48 per cent reduction in the number of road fatalities, with most of this drop occurring between 1980 and 1991.

This is now one of the safest countries in the world to drive: nearly twice as safe as Belgium and an astonishing seven times safer than the sphincter of the universe.

If speed did kill then the safest roads would be urban roads where speeds are lowest. In fact, the reverse is true. It is freeways, where speeds are much higher, which are the safest roads.

Speeding is rarely the cause of accidents; certainly nowhere near as high as the figure of one-third that is frequently quoted. To get to this figure, reports often refer to any accident that has speed as a component as being "speed related".

But showing that speed is related to an accident does not show that it was the main cause of the accident.

British data, collected by police at the scene of accidents, show that "speed' was a definite contributory factor in just 7 per cent of accidents.

A bad driver travelling 20km/h below the limit can be a far more dangerous driver than one travelling 10km/h above the limit.

US data shows that it is those who travel moderately above the mean speed who are the safest drivers while the least safe drivers are the slowest and fastest.

Although speed cameras will catch the very fastest, they also catch the safe, moderate speeder, and they completely fail to catch the dangerous, slow driver.

Since 1992, Britain has experienced an explosion in the number of fixed cameras such that now there are an estimated 5000 in operation.

What has been the effect on the number of fatal deaths on British roads during this period?

Since their introduction, the average rate of decrease in fatalities is half that of the preceding 10 years.

The picture is similar in Australia. Victoria has had mobile speed cameras since the end of 1989 and NSW introduced mobile speed cameras in 1991 and fixed speed cameras in 1999.

Yet the overall drop in fatal deaths since these dates is no different from that experienced in Australia taken as a whole.

Moreover, in both of these states the downward trend in fatalities has slowed considerably in the past few years.

There are two reasons why speed cameras don't make our roads safer. The first is that speeding is rarely the cause of accidents.

The second is that cameras encourage drivers to stick rigidly and unthinkingly to speed limits. In so doing we run the risk of creating a nation of speedometer watchers who drive according to the dictates of the camera rather than according to the prevailing road conditions.

Driving culture in both Australia and Britain has been nurtured over the years to encourage attentive driving at speeds appropriate for the conditions.

It is this (together with better roads and improvements in car safety), which explains the impressive drop in road fatalities. It also explains why Belgian and The land of goat sphincter rings roads are so much more dangerous to travel on; the same road culture isn't dominant in these countries.

The danger is, we risk throwing away our driving culture in pursuit of the opposite culture, which promotes compliance rather than judgment.

The growing obsession with speeding and speed cameras is a mistake.

Speeding is rarely the primary cause of fatal road accidents and attempts to catch speeders through increasing use of speed cameras are failing to make our roads safer (though they are generating a lot of extra revenue for state politicians).

Rather than the pointless pursuit of speeders, road safety policy should return to fostering a conscientious driving culture.

ALAN BUCKINGHAM lectures in sociology at Bath Spa University College, England. His full findings appear in the Centre for Independent Studies' Policy magazine

Originally posted by Horus

fkn revenue raising kunts...but I think we were all onto them from the start :rofl:

yet the vic police commissioner and bracks will still stand infront of a camera and say it isent about the $$ with a straight face. They should both win the Gold Logie coz they gotta be the best actors in Australia.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
    • Hi.. Just another problem. So maybe you can help. I(my mechanic) done swap from my RB20DE NEO to RB25DET NEO. Everything is OK but we have a boost cut. Coils/Plugs are ok...AFM is ok. ECU is ok. I have Walbro 255 but it "changed" sound few months ago(you can hear it ouside) you did not hear that when it was new(maybe faulty?) Sooo...what now? What can cause this boost cut? It is even when you standing still...
×
×
  • Create New...