Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just been back from the EPA, and with the boost almost stock it still turned out 92db instead of the approved 90db. He would not pass it and i don't consider my car loud.

So i need to take 2db off it, so whats my best options??

I might replace the 3 inch cat with the standard 2.5 inch cat and try and turn the boost down even further, would this do it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/
Share on other sites

dang.. if its nearly at stock boost levels there probably isn't much else you can do to reduce it further by playing with the boost. You could try and make it spool up very late, so its making maximum boost later on, and hence less noise down low.

Did you put the standard box back on? if anything you want to restrict the airflow the best you can, generally the opposite you'd usually want to do.

Stock cat should be a bit quieter, but might not get you under. I passed with full 3" hi-flow cat, but i think mine was a bit of a freak passing with absolutely no exhaust modifications.

Do you have a resonator in there? (its like a bulge you might see in the pipe). Bends in the pipework i think also tend to reduce the noise a bit.

Otherwise its time to borrow a stock exhaust off somebody.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-583572
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Robo's

Just been back from the EPA, and with the boost almost stock it still turned out 92db instead of the approved 90db. He would not pass it and i don't consider my car loud.

So i need to take 2db off it, so whats my best options??

I might replace the 3 inch cat with the standard 2.5 inch cat and try and turn the boost down even further, would this do it?

THat's farcked!!! Go and ask them how do you know your machine is not farked!!!

ask them to test on other machine...

2db come on that;s nothing compare to harley davison Bikes.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-584431
Share on other sites

This story sounds familiar.

I got done for 2dB over the limit nearly 18 months ago now. I fixed it by adding another resonator under the car. Originally I had a hotdog style resonator and barrel type s/s muffler at the back of my 3" system and recorded 92dB. Had another box type resonator installed inline with the hotdog and it brought the reading down to 89dB, just enough to get the EPA off my back.

As long as you use straight through type mufflers and resonators you shouldn't loose too much power, but honestly, I wish I had just borrowed a standard exhaust for the test. It would have saved cutting up a perfectly good exhaust.

Z.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-585786
Share on other sites

OK, if you go the steel wool, good luck. I tried this on rumour and all I managed to do was shoot flaming pieces of steel wool out of the exhaust - was pretty funny actually.

If you have the standard Jap type muffler - sounds like you have an N1 type or similar, most will have a small hole right near the tip at the bottom. This is so you can attach a muffler to the exhaust 'for street use', as a loud exhaust should only be used on the track:)

Autobahn sell the muffler inserts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-586446
Share on other sites

CrazyGTR is spot on, get a piece of thin sheetmetal and put a single smallish hole in the middle, maybe 15mm diameter and put this between the cat and the pipe flange.

If you are clever, it will not be seen, especially if you spray it with black muffler paint around the bright cut edge, before you fit it .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/28036-failed-epa-by-2db/#findComment-586979
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • That looks good, but I think you're going to need much beefier side skirts now.
    • They are daft and there's a reason it never caught on. Steering feel? We don't need no stinking steering feel!
    • I gotta pull you up on this. It's driving me crazy. A shutter is something that closes, like over a window or in a cmera. The word you want is shudder. That LSD is clearly f**ked. Take it to a diff shop and get it disassembled and examined by an expert. YOu might have plates welded together or something equally crazy.
    • Define "starting to fail". Wy not just rebuild them?
    • Check the Nistune doco. There are a few assumptions being made here that might not be valid. I will list the things that occur to me: Base map. Base map for what? Base map for Z32? Then the cranking pulse width is probably wrong for an RB25. The extra 500cc of capacity might well be enough to prevent it from catching. Base map for RB25? I don't think you can load one of those into a Z32. You have to just make the settings correct for an RB25 in the Z32 base map. That is either K or the TIM to get the pulsewidth right. Loom. You bought a loom for an RB. And you plugged it into a Z32 ECU. Did you make sure that any iwre differences were swapped. From memory, there's at least a couple. And as per the others, I would suggest making sure that the fuel pressure is correct while cranking and that the injectors are actually flowing as expected. They really must come out and go on the bench, unless you do find that you have messed up as per above points. I would also suggest watching in Nistune to make sure that everything is reading correctly. That the correct binary flags are raised at the right time (like the crank signal), that there's no stupid values in K or TIM. That you have not got mismatched firmware for the ECU and/or a wrong image loaded.
×
×
  • Create New...