Jump to content
SAU Community

Does Anyone Have The Specs For Jun 272 11.35 Cams? What Are The Carnk Angles At Max Lifts?

9krpm

By 9krpm,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

9krpm Mentor

9krpm

Posted
Posted (edited)

I am hoping to dial in my Jun 272 11.35mm cams (for a rb26/30) before a retune but I can't seem to find any info on them. I've checked their website but still not able to find out exactly what crank angles the intake and exhaust are at max lift

http://www.junauto.co.jp/products/cylinder...ft-rb26.html?en

Has anyone got the these info handy?

Thanks in advance for sharing :happy:

Edited by 9krpm
bigmikespec Veteran

bigmikespec

Posted
Posted

Sorry I can not offer any help as such, but more interested in your set up.

They are high lift cams (no s**t), I think JUN also do a 264 11.35mm, is there a lot of additional head work to run those sort of cams and also regular maintenance (i.e. checking valve springs). Also, would higher lift cams be similar in using oversize valves, in trying to achieve the same thing in terms of having a larger opening for the inlet and exhaust valves.

Good luck with it,

Mike

9krpm Mentor

9krpm

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Thanks for that Unique.

It's been a while since I played with cams and I was only taught how to dial the cams with the specified crank angles at max lifts, not duration.

I will give it a try.

bigmikespec, yes these big lifters needs retainers and springs. It has larger valves too so had a bit of head work. It's an engine in a track car so it will get a new set of springs and retainers every couple of years when I pull it apart for maintenance.

Edited by 9krpm
9krpm Mentor

9krpm

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I just received an email from Jun.

FTW they recommended "Take centre angle 110 degree from TDC for intake cam and 115 degree for exhaust cam"

It is good to see they are doing something similar to what we usually do in Australia, takes 2 from intake and add up to 4 for exh from the centre line for Jap cams :P

So I guess your 112 for centre line is correct Unique1. Thanks mate :P

Edited by 9krpm

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • AnimalGarage
      spot the stagea

      By AnimalGarage · Posted

      It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...