Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As an engineer who sets up various control loops in industry I will have crack. A controller typically has three values of interest:

Setpoint (SP) - The amount of boost you want

Control Value (CV) - The output to the variable bleed valve, or pulsing of on/off valve or pushing/pulling the wastegate itself.

Process Value (PV) - The amount of boost you are getting.

To manually set one up you would typically make a step change to the CV (eg. valve from 0% to 50% open) and measure the response to the PV (how long it takes to reach the final boost value, and rate of change). With these measurements you set controller such that it gets the value you want as soon as possible, with little over shoot, and then hold where you want it.

A "learning" controller does this for you. While learning it changes whatever it varies to effect boost level and measures what effect it has on boost with your setup (ie. your turbo, your exhaust, ambient temp etc.).

It's not hype it's necessity. If it doesn't learn you would either have slow spool up or overshoot.

  • 4 weeks later...

with the GReddy Profec A, its learning mode is used to learn the features of the actuator type, external wastegates, and the stability of the boost curve. There are two learning phases:

1. Learns the stock base boost level

2. Learns the basic boost curve and the difference between the pressure in the wastegate and the pressure in the intake manifold.

You need to run the learning mode again after any changes are made to the characteristics of the wastegate spring or the power output of the engine.

Not sure about the apexi boost control kit for the pfc, but would assume it is similar.

for example, after installing my pfc, Z32 afm's and cam gears, I had trouble with boost spiking and then dropping off at high rpm. After running the learning mode it now once again holds my desired boost level spot on through the entire rev range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...