Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

We have been selling these for while now and can get them real quick, so if you need good handling tyres like the KU36. Please give us a call..

Designed for SCCA racing that demands high Uniform Tire Quality Grades, this incredible tire delivers unrivaled dry grip with split-second steering response, and its unique footprint is designed to deliver consistent handling performance at high G-forces.

Special Features

* Low void asymmetric tread pattern with circumferential grooving for high cornering grip.

* Ultra fine carbon black compounding for maximum traction.

* Ultra wide tread contact with highly rounded shoulders for optimized footprint shape during high lateral loads.

* Developed for quick autocross warm-up while maintaining race track durability.

* With a W speed rating, the tire delivers an optimum run temperature of 203 degrees Fahrenheit.

* UTQG rating of 180 AA/A.

Comparable Competitor Products

Falken Azenis RT-615, Yokohama ADVAN Neova AD07

kt_14_ku36.jpg

205/50/15 KU36 $155.00

215/45/16 KU36 $135.00

225/50/16 KU36 $155.00

215/45/17 KU36 $165.00

225/45/17 KU36 $195.00

235/45/17 KU36 $170.00

245/40/17 KU36 $215.00

245/45/17 KU36 $205.00

255/40/17 KU36 $230.00

275/40/17 KU36 $250.00

285/40/17 KU36 $260.00

295/35/17 KU36 $235.00

315/35/17 KU36 $250.00

335/35/17 KU36 $255.00

225/40/18 KU36 $235.00

225/45/18 KU36 $235.00

235/40/18 KU36 $210.00

245/35/18 KU36 $210.00

245/40/18 KU36 $255.00

265/35/18 KU36 $240.00

275/35/18 KU36 $275.00

285/35/19 KU36 $270.00

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/284228-otr-kuhmo-ku36/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

im interested in these tyres.

are they still good for road use and still handle ok in the wet because i do most of my driving on the street.

also how much for 4 of them my tyre size is 235/45/r17.

thanks.

scott.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/284228-otr-kuhmo-ku36/#findComment-4778879
Share on other sites

im interested in these tyres.

are they still good for road use and still handle ok in the wet because i do most of my driving on the street.

also how much for 4 of them my tyre size is 235/45/r17.

thanks.

scott.

They are extremely grippy in the dry and not bad in the wet either can do Fitted $700

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/284228-otr-kuhmo-ku36/#findComment-4778927
Share on other sites




  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...