Announcements
-
Similar Content
-
-
Latest Posts
-
Also, it is just about triangularity. The less angle, the easier it physically is to do. Think of the amount of slip you're getting, as how hard you need to push an object. More slip, equals pushing way harder. Then the ramp is how steep the hill is. The Accel is less slip, which means it takes less pushing (less slip) to get it to be able to push apart. However, the steeper sides on the decell means it will take a lot more pushing (slip) to get it up the ramp. -
It's the angle of the ramp from the vertical. You're measuring from the horizontal. To convert, take 90* minus your angle reference = Nismo Angle.
-
I agree, thus 45 degree is the *max* force one could apply to it. This is similar to what I've seen in uh... simulations... which allow you to play with diff ramp angles. Anything higher (or lower) than 45 degree would produce less force as 45 is the max... triangley. I would state the 1 way is 90 degree, at least this is how my brain and other ways of explaining it refer to it. 90 degree also effectively acted completely open. I realise Nismo refer to it not as 90 (or 89) but "1". So I'm not understanding the angle on which these angles are based. -
.thumb.jpg.1b7f9b555236b5ea56c3fed20c733de8.jpg)
-
Yes. Do thought experiment. Make the left ramp, the 45° ramp, one degree steeper. It will then be 44° from the vertical. What happens to the forces? Too hard to tell? Well, add one more degree, and then keep doing that until it looks exactly like the near vertical wall of the 1-way opening. I would suggest that every degree less than 45° (from vertical) reduces the reaction force, if continually removing them from 45 gets you back to the 1-way profile.
-
.thumb.jpg.1b7f9b555236b5ea56c3fed20c733de8.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now