Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yes, and no it works intermittenly i am looking at the sensor and going to replace it with a new one i bought.

its looking more like a timing issue. i need the correct trigger settings for the RB25

its metal cover cas with half circle key, i had a spare ( i know these suckers are expensive so i got a spare one cheap) i just installed it. i had someone look at my datalog and they noticed my home count constantly increased, so we are going to look into that, like i said i fixxed tps issue, i had to change the power and ground pins around ( odd i know cause it worked fine on power fc) as car as coolant temp, i am not sure i installed my new one, could the issue be caused by a low coolant lvl ? its weird cause it actually registers correctly some times and other times not at all

i got it to start, couple issues though, might be injector dead time i will lload up datalog, but car is at 120 effieceiny in VE for it to start, and it runs rough, idle is bad

good stuff. what did you have to do to get it going? is it running enough to match the ecu timing to the real timing?

i added shit ton of fuel, car idles at around 5000 rpm and gradualy increases,

http://www.mediafire.com/?emtoy4i2dhj

thats the datalog, its weird as all hell. i made progress but just open larger can of worms it seems. sigh. i am going to see if i can stick some stock injectors in there, cause problem couild be caused by injectors is what people pn haltehc forum think

hard thing about the injecters is getting the correct dead time map, if the contructer dosn't provide it you have to rely on what you find on google (like i did). Probably should try and set the wideband up, it should have come with a V vs AFR graph to put into the software.

hard thing about the injecters is getting the correct dead time map, if the contructer dosn't provide it you have to rely on what you find on google (like i did). Probably should try and set the wideband up, it should have come with a V vs AFR graph to put into the software.

the info you got was correct i contacted the maker to verify, i was told the 5000rpm idle is caused by vacuum leak but i dont see shit, only thing i can think of is the iac and plumbing for it outside of that, idk i have vacuum hooked up to the niple on wastegate on oem turbo, to fuel pressure reg, to map sensor, to the BOV, and i got one to the pcv hose on top of motor

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...