Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys just wondering if there are any benifits with splitting the wastegate gasses for the first 10-20 cm on downpipes... i think i saw hks ones similar to this!

and on the other end of the scale there are the single 3" pipe catering for both!

like batmbl is selling!

what are the pros and cons of these designs?

after taking the advice on the Next recommended upgrade thread i started a while ago i have since bought a fmic and have done a bit of research and found there are 2 ways to route the inlet air from the core!

---either in through the engine bay and infront of the engine and over the fan..

----or back under neath the core..therefore being able to follow factory pipes from this side!

from what i can see the first option is safer for the piping..however one has just spent all this money to lower inlet air then the pipes are sent right next to the engine..with the heat sink on this pipe thus reheating the air that had just been cooled! what a waste!!!!!can thermal tape fix this?

secondly to run the pipe under the core would be hard considering i gave R34 GTR end tanks and i have seen some cooler kits specificly designed for the end tank to point back the other way! also this return pipe has a greater chance of being damaged!

which option would be the best?

thanks ;)

pete

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/31496-working-on-next-recommended-upgrades/
Share on other sites

The way id look at it is, what your planning to do with future mods. If your planing to change your inlet plenum to a front facing type then it would be easyer to mod pipe work thats run across in the engine bay. the intercooler still works fine when run this way. Prob would be easyer givin your gtr cooler is set up that way.

runing the pipe work back to the standard set up would prob cost less as you can use standard pipe work.

Both ways you still have to cross the hot engine to TB.

heat wrap is another tacktic used to try and keep inlet temps down, it will help to a small degree but some of the cons that people have told me is it can cause corrosion from traped moisture. i have wraped the standard crossover pipe and not had any problems.

I have heard from some people that having a separate wastegate pipe doesn't really have much of an advantage over a complete dump pipe (dump pipe without any separation of exhaust gasses) when dealing with the stock turbo. On the other hand I have had others tell me there would be a few kw in difference between the two pipe designs. I personally believe that with a stock turbo the separate wastegate pipe would give slightly better performance over the single pipe, with the real advantages been unlocked with a larger aftermarket turbo application.

The advantage of the separate wastgate pipe is to avoid/reduce any interference to the flow of exhaust gasses from the turbine when the wastegate is open, which in theory the single pipe will not do as well. Also the separate wastegate pipe should have a venturi effect on the wastegate gasses from the flow of the other exhaust flow, so the flow of the other exhaust gasses should "pull" the wastegate gasses out quickly due to the pressure difference out and keep the exit of both exhaust gasses fast. Please correct me if I am wrong though.

The advantage of the single 3" dump/front pipe would be the price, which would probably be cheaper than the separate wastegate dump alone, but of course choice of brand will influence this.

In the end I guess you have to work out if the slight increase from the separate wastegate pipe is worth the extra money and how extensively you will further modify the car in the future to determine which pipe is worth it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...