Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys, alot of you on here have seen my thread ref my 26/30 build. car has run faultless for 12k and 2.5 years, decided to go link g4 this year so bought one and had a base map loaded to get my car ready for the mapping, when i started it up at home it was rich 8.1, got the laptop on straight away and after about 10 mins got it down correct, i had never used the g4 sofware before hence the delay in turning the fuelling down, anyway onto the trailer it went for the 300 mile round trip on the dynopacks. changed oil and filter before i went also, car runs cp,s spool rods, acl duraglides,n1 oil /water pumps, trust sump,6 boost many, gt4094r at 2bar boost, 1000cc inj,twin pumps etc.ran on the dyno for about 2 hours on low boost upto 1.4 bar and 8k limit. switched of had a brew then restated car, after a few seconds the engine started to tap, switched it of and removed plugs. no5 piston tapping head game over,stripped it down at home and no5 big end spun, all the rest mains and big ends are fine, apart from scoring which will be shell contamination, had crank checked, well bent 10 thou on no6 main.

questions.

did the overfuelling help do this

n1 oil pump issue at 8k

clearances on bearings when i built it where 2 thou mains/big ends 4thou endfloat,

enfloat is still 4thou after 12k

have bought a tomei pump now and 1000bhp ati damper.

rotating assembly was balanced but using original rb26 front pulley, this has slight cracking on the rubber now, could this have been an harmonic issue..

see pic below guys, feel free to comment, good or bad..lol

IMG_0607.jpg

IMG_0606.jpg

IMG_0604.jpg

IMG_0624.jpg

also some skirt scuffing and side wall bore markings, was bored at 3.5 thou clearance?.

IMG_0623.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/314960-my-2630-is-rooted/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sorry to hear that shane, I've been watching your build on the uk site and it is a weapon.

Of u spun a big end bearing maybe it is oil pressure related? U did a good thing binning that n1 pump.

What ecu were u running previous to the g4? If it happened when u did the ecu switch the cause sounds quite obvious, the base tune on the g4?

hi marko, was on apexi d-jetro b4, the car has never been driven on the road with the new g4. just had a rough base map loaded so i could run the car upto temp and check for oil leaks and water leaks.

Shaun, what did your tuner say? Surely he had an idea of the cause...I mean, u have driven it for 2.5yrs without any issues then when u changed the ecu the problem arises?

How did the oil pump look? I remember u saying 6mths ago that u had high oil pressure which is what u want

oil pump is good mate, took it apart no scoring or anything. tuner thinks the over fuelling washed the shells prior to the dyno session?. they all look very shiny like they have been chromed, i was using acl duraglides too not race..the only real difference i can see is that very rarely did i hold it at 8k, but it was at 8k for quite a few runs, not holding but peaking there,not sure if the constant 8k revs could have done this to it?.

IMG_0628.jpg

Well my engine is rev limited to 9000rpm and other built engines such as rips racing can go to beyond 10krpm.

U really need the opinion of an expert, have u placed this thread on gtr.co.uk? I bet if rob at rips looked at it, he will work it out :devil:

Rob has helped me in the past and his theories have proved correct.

Once u put your thread on the uk, pls send me the link as I am highly interested in this.

Fuel washing out oil sounds possible as 8:1 is extremely rich BUT I'm not an engine builder, its also good that you bought an aftermarket balancer as I heard that rb30s are more susceptible to vibration at high revs

U did a good thing binning that n1 pump.

Can you stop being a mindless sheep?

There is nothing wrong with N1 pumps when used within reason.

The N1 pump has nothing to do with the failure here at all. So it being a "good thing" to bin it is just silly and unfounded commentary.

Can you stop being a mindless sheep?

There is nothing wrong with N1 pumps when used within reason.

The N1 pump has nothing to do with the failure here at all. So it being a "good thing" to bin it is just silly and unfounded commentary.

good piont mate, i have sold the n1 on, not because its failed but because i will be revving higher when i rebuild it and just dont want to risk it.. i have run 2 x n1,s now on motors i have built no issues, my rev limit is 10k, high yes but i believe the issue with the n1 is rev limit related. so if you never hit the limiter your n1 should last. the pump has done many track days and been to 8350 rpm no issues. i am just taking a leap and trying the tomei, i have a friend running a gt42 on a 26/30 that revs over 9k and will been in the 900,s horsepower wise. so this has just swayed me to the tomei. bernie

well the big end bearing can realy only contact the crank surface when the protective oil film has broken down,this can be caused by lack of oil pressure supply to the bearing in question, extreme detonation or abbrasive particles in the oil, i believe 8krpm is well high enough but each to their own, crank specific harmonic dampers become very important on straight sixes at high rpm,the bent crank clearly indicated a problem! i would be very interested to see the cause of the failure,best of luck

Damage to the main bearing journels could be colatteral damage, as a result of debris in the oil system after the rod bearing let go.

Do you know what your oil pressure was at 8000 rpm? The old school rule says 10psi per 1000 rpm but I'd be leaning to 15psi/1000 rpm with an engine that makes the power like yours does.

Were your rod bearing previously factor or clevite? Im wondering if it might have been a little detonation too, slowly hammering the rod bearings till they gave way. Changing to an ACL rod bearing may help the engine tolerate the punishment a little more next time.

Can you stop being a mindless sheep?

There is nothing wrong with N1 pumps when used within reason.

The N1 pump has nothing to do with the failure here at all. So it being a "good thing" to bin it is just silly and unfounded commentary.

If you had lost an engine at 900klm you would feel the same way as Marko. The engine in question was a low revving item that was never put under stress...N1 went bang.

GTRNUR...correct...the mains are all shiny from eating rod bearing material.

Edited by Swiper the Fox

i often wonder if the gallery bores are sufficent to suply that kind of flow at such high rpm,the pressure indication means sweet toss all if the film is still getting broken down due to rpm film thinning and the oil port on the crank being unable to supply the required flow?

have you still got the oil? get it checked for fuel that will tell you very quickly if that was the problem.

i think its more likely there was another problem that showed itself with the sustained high revs - maybe a slight bend in the crank from the start? was it tunnel bored or checked for straightness on first assembly? or more likely just pinging up high smashing the rod bearing (it is #6 after all)

not sure if it may have anything to do with your problem but in regards to the SPOOL rods, i was shocked to find out that all the rods where uneven heights (centre to centre).

When my engine builder dummy assembled the block he found that all the pistons where at different heights. he had to remachine the big ends so all good now. I thought maybe i got a bad batch of rods but my brother had EXACTLY the same problem. The material used is great but the build quality from experience is not.

I wonder how many ppl have just bolted these rods in without checking piston heights??? Just my 2 cent, like i said not sure if it has anything to do with your issue but worth checking if you havent already.

cheers guys for replying. to answer a few questions

i spoke to brad @ spool and these are the very first rods he had made. we just weighed them and fitted them not presuming they were different lengths, but then again its done over 15 trackdays and 12k so would have shown a problem sooner ?.

bearings were acl duraglide

oil pressure was 100 psi at 8k

oil was silkolene pro r 15/50w

old oil stank of petrol and had about a litre too much in, bear in mind i run twin pumps and 1000cc sards. wont take long at 8.0.1 afr to do that.was changed after afr set and prior to dyno run,car was never driven with the contaminated oil in the motor

crank was checked for true when i had it polished and collar fitted also.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...