Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well i unfortunately today learnt that no they aren't a straight swap and are a fair bit of a headache to swap over.

I also installed a FMIC today if your putting in a cooler series 2 bar is much much easier i didn't even trim the bar and it fit straight back on.

So people don't waste too much on a series 1 front bar unless you can fabricate a way to fit it nicely

So i guess it is confirmed that an R34 series 1 front bumper will deffinetaly not fit straight onto a series 2 front?

That is a pain as i was also looking at fitting the series 1 front bar to my series 2 34. What are the issues that stop it from bolting on straight up? and how much work is involved getting it to fit?

Also would there be similiar issues in fitting a nimso/altia front bumper to the S2 r34 or will it be a straight bolt on?

Cheers.

So i guess it is confirmed that an R34 series 1 front bumper will deffinetaly not fit straight onto a series 2 front?

That is a pain as i was also looking at fitting the series 1 front bar to my series 2 34. What are the issues that stop it from bolting on straight up? and how much work is involved getting it to fit?

Also would there be similiar issues in fitting a nimso/altia front bumper to the S2 r34 or will it be a straight bolt on?

Cheers.

I'm sorry but people like you piss me off, read the f*kn thread dude.

It's been posted about 4 times what needs to be done, most clearly in the last 5 or so posts.

And maddowse you can modify the bumper to fit if your keen on spending an hour or 2 cutting away the unnecessary plastic on the series 1 bumper so it doesn't get in the way of the series 2 reinforcement bars and then make up some clips/ties to hold the bumper into position where it meets the bonnet.

I might post up some photo's of my bumper if i get round to it

Edited by R34 -_-

yeah that would be great , i wish the didnt make it so hard lol make me think if most aftermarket bars are made for series on then were stuck with stuffing arround hey !

i get a day off monday so ill be playing arround so see what your talking about and wether its worth the hastle

thanks for the help

Edited by maddowse

If i were you i would get the parts from a wrecker and do it properly, that way it look 100%.

If you can, get a mate to help you fit the bumper to the car when you've finished modifying it, its a real pain in the ass trying to do it by yourself, when i put mine on i had to do it one side at a time and every time i tried to get the whole thing on, one side would pop off lol you have to force it a little bit :P

And have a look at getting a lip for it, makes it lower at the front and adds a bit off R34 GT-R style to it

If i were you i would get the parts from a wrecker and do it properly, that way it look 100%.

If you can, get a mate to help you fit the bumper to the car when you've finished modifying it, its a real pain in the ass trying to do it by yourself, when i put mine on i had to do it one side at a time and every time i tried to get the whole thing on, one side would pop off lol you have to force it a little bit :blush:

And have a look at getting a lip for it, makes it lower at the front and adds a bit off R34 GT-R style to it

thanks guys what im going to do is remove everything from the front (bracket wise ) and do a test fit and bit by bit ill replace stuff untill it doesnt fit any more , then i will know exactly what i need to get from the wreckers to do it right !!!,

whats this front lip ? were do i look to see what it looks like , ??? yeah ill get my mate or wife to give me a hand ,

thanks again for all the help i guess ill take some picks as i go and put up a step by step for future refence for others that are interested

Yeh ok my bad man, no need to loose your shit over it.

Maddowse, that would be great if you end up doing a write up on how you went getting it to fit.

Like the other guy was reffering a lip on the front bar would look good, thats what im planning on doing later on.

Eastbear and Uras make some good ones, the last 2 photos are uras. The east bear lip is pretty expensive but viva garage in adelade make copies of both brands, does any body else know if anyone in melbourne makes copies of these lips?

http://www.vivagarage.com.au/cart/index.php?page=3&c=87

post-73401-1277640748_thumb.png

post-73401-1277640769_thumb.jpg

post-73401-1277640780_thumb.jpg

pulled my bumper off today to have a better look ! i do need to change the front reo and the two brackets under the lights problem is i cant seem to find a place to get hold of them , i need to find a wreckers that has a skyline with the front still intact thats the hard bit .

but ill get there

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...