Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my baby is on the market for sale. its a 97 series II. has done 90,000kms.

serviced every 5,000 and have always put BP ultimate.

well looked after car.

Selling due to other commitments.

INCLUDES: TWIN AIRBAGS

BOOST GAUGE

DUAL STAGE BOOST CONTROLLER

FULL PIONNER SOUND SYSTEM

ALL MECHANICALLY STOCK

SILVER

3 POINT IMMOBOLISER ALARM TO SATISFY INSURANCE

PERSONALISED NUMBER PLATES MRR.33E

WILL SELL WITH CAR

PRICE--------------- 23,500 NEG

PLEASE MAKE AN OFFER AS I NEED THE MONEY THIS WEEK AND PLEASE KEEP IT REASONABLE HAS THIS IS A 97 MODEL.

YOU CAN EITHER CONTACT ME ON 0438 299 543 OR BY EMAIL [email protected]

CHEERS :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/33352-must-sell-r33-today-cheap/
Share on other sites

no the timing belt has not yet been changed i was told by my mechanic to wait until it gets to 100,000kms. nothing is mechanically wrong with it. it just has to go not that i want to

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...