Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Meril: does the sulphur have an effect on your engine? I thought it may contaminate your oil or something like that.... The instant power would cause a bit of blow-by? And nitrogen, wont that turn into an acidic if you dont clean your donk out after a few runs with N2O?

Even the post by rev10 states ‘oxygen ions’ not oxygen molecules which are two completely different things. The site I mentioned does talk about combustion in general…normal combustion requires the odd free radical to get it going…formed from O2 splitting. But as I was saying the extra power is from the huge amount of free radicals initiating the burn…produced by the decomposition of N2O directly into N2 + O*…it defeats the laws of physics to break down to O* generate O2 then break back to O*…that would rob energy from the reaction, which it obviously doesn’t as the car does get more power.

Merli, here's the link to the NOS kit direct port kit with the injector spacers:

http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLine/Prod...SNS/NOSzle.html

A few other companies have copied this design now and are producing kits as well, pity the smallest kick you can get with the NOS kit on a 6 cylinder is 75hp...

Oh yeah, and Summit are selling this for ~$1100US, which works out to be around $1900 landed (with shipping, customs, tax etc.).

Edit: The sulphur is such a low quantity it has no effect on the engine, but makes you quite sick if you try to get high on it.

Dan, I respect you as a chemist, and you know what? FINE... It breaks down into O* free radicals... WHATEVER. It really makes NO DIFFERENCE whatsoever, what the Nitrous Oxide breaks down into pre-combustion when it hits atmospheric pressures and boils...

You obviously have no idea about Nitrous Oxide in automotive applications, and you just thought you'd stick your head in here and throw your $0.02c in, because you've done chemistry and thought it would be fun to talk about chemisty...

I can't be stuffed talking about what the fcuk N2O breaks down into anymore... If you think it breaks down into O*, fine... I only know what I've read, and what I've read makes sense to me... If that's wrong, then so be it. IT DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHAT N2O BREAKS DOWN INTO. All it does it supply the engine with SUPPLEMENTED oxygen, (it doesn't replace anything) so we can inject more fuel and make more power.

"same amount of fuel"... God help us. Seriously.

Sumo: As doughboy said, the sulphur dioxide doesn't affect your engine at all... There's only a teeny weeny bit of it in there, and it's only to stop kids going to their local performance workshop and buying 10lbs or nitrous to sniffing it :D

As for the Nitrogen turning acidic... I doubt it, as the air that we breathe and what we pump into our engines contains about 78% Nitrogen...

aircomp.gif

But perhaps Dan or Nath can confirm that one...

Look Chemistry aside do some minor calculations:

just say 1 shot = 10ml of N2O

10ml of N2O will displace 10ml of normal air

N2O contains 36% O atoms therefore 10ml of N2O will contain 0.36 x 10ml = 3.6ml of O atoms which will equal 1.8ml of O2 molecules if they form oxygen before combustion according to Merril

However air already contains 20% of Oxygen so 10mls of air will equal (0.2x 10ml) 2ml of O2 molecules

Hence atmospheric air already has more oxygen in it then the nitrous per volume.

Who here has seen simply winding the boost (adding more oxygen) up outperforms adding nos in terms of power gains.....its radical molecular mechanism man!

You do need help Merli...seems you can't even comprehend percentages based on O2 and O.

I was only saying that's the way nitrous worked...but you got your arse in your hand and decided to get a bit personal with it....get over yourself and just accept it when someone is actually trying to help on the forums by telling it how it is.

I'm done with this thread!!!

10ml of N2O will displace 10ml of normal air

Hmmmm... Why do you think that the nitrous oxide REPLACES air in the cylinder? By that theory, a turbocharger blowing air through the intake manifold (akin to nitrous jet blowing nitrous through the intake manifold) will DISPLACE air in the cylinders...

I'm afraid that it doesn't do this Nath, it SUPPLEMENTS the air... The engine literally sucks MORE O radicals/O2 molecules/Whatever into the cylinder so that we can squirt more fuel in and burn the extra oxygen -> More POWAH!!!

So going by your calculations, we'd be gettin 2ml of oxygen from air + 1.8ml of oxygen from the nitrous.

Which doesn't make sense to me btw... How does 3.6ml of Oxygen atoms suddenly halve in volume when bonded to form molecules? There are still the original amount of atoms sitting there, why would their volume change just because they've bonded?

Who here has seen simply winding the boost (adding more oxygen) up outperforms adding nos in terms of power gains.....its radical molecular mechanism man!

But to simply "add more boost" you have got to consider alot of things.

Will the shaft speed of the turbo cope with it?

Do you have enough fuel flow with regards to injectors/pump?

Will your fuel computer provide the proper A/F ratio?

Are you simply falling off the edge of efficiency and just pumping hot air?

Can the turbo physically flow that much air?

There is no possible way that increasing the boost pressure on a system operating at it's peak efficiency already will outperform a turbo setup with nitrous injection. Just the intercooling effect of nitrous alone is enough to outperform a turbo only system operating past it's peak.

Consider an example. You've got a nice and shiny RB26 with 2530s. Running at 1.5/1.7 bar you're getting ~350awkw. To get over ~400awkw you'll either have to change to a larger turbo setup or install a small fogger kit. By going to a larger turbo (a T78 should be able to do it) you're going to loose alot of the response and low-down power that the 2530's are praised for. Pick a gas kit and you can increase both the response of the 2530's and the power output.

Excuse me for rambling but just wanted to point out there are alot of factors to consider with regards to engine setups.

Edit: Nath_gtir, you have forgotten to factor in temperature to your equations....

You do need help Merli...seems you can't even comprehend percentages based on O2 and O.

I was only saying that's the way nitrous worked...but you got your arse in your hand and decided to get a bit personal with it....get over yourself and just accept it when someone is actually trying to help on the forums by telling it how it is.

I'm done with this thread!!!

How did I get personal with it? I never attacked you personally...

"I need help"? Sounds like that's a personal attack, but I ain't gonna get my panties in a bunch over it... You've obviously stuck your head into a thread because you could throw your chemistry wand around, but you neglected to have even a BASIC understanding on how the chemicals work in this application.

"Hmmmm... Why do you think that the nitrous oxide REPLACES air in the cylinder?"

Because cylinder volume doesn't magically increase when you add nitrous so it has to replace something it's the Law of conservation of matter.

"How does 3.6ml of Oxygen atoms suddenly halve in volume when bonded to form molecules?"

Because it is to do with kinetic energy and molecular/atomic orbital theory, thats like asking why does the volume increase in water when we heat it to steam.

Dough boy: I am just making a comparison that is all but thanks for the info...nice insight!

and I dont need temp I am simply making a point about oxygen availability per mole of N2O opposed to oxygen from air, But you are right technically (PV=nRT- ideal gas equation).

As I said this is my opinion and I will stick to

"Hmmmm... Why do you think that the nitrous oxide REPLACES air in the cylinder?"  

Because cylinder volume doesn't magically increase when you add nitrous so it has to replace something it's the Law of conservation of matter.

You're squeezing more gas into the same volume... The engine is SUCKING in air and the turbo/nitrous is PUSHING in air... results in greater than atmospheric cylinder pressures before compression... That's what boost is.

"How does 3.6ml of Oxygen atoms suddenly halve in volume when bonded to form molecules?"

Because it is to do with kinetic energy and  molecular/atomic orbital theory, thats like asking why does the volume increase in water when we heat it to steam.  

I see, I see... Interesting!

I'm not sure if this has been covered as a point ,but oxygen O2 acts to burn/react with something by becoming ionic. This is why there aren't explosions all the time in the atmosphere with O2 running into hydrogen.You need a bit of energy to get the ball rolling.

The N20 molecule liberates the O ion quite easily under the severity of combustion. This is why in and of itself it is not very flamable but, does add ferosity to an exisiting fire.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
    • There is a really fun solution to this problem, buy a Haltech (or ECU of your choice) and put the MAF in the bin.  I'm assuming your going to want more power in future, so you'll need to get the ECU at some stage. I'd put the new MAF money towards the new ECU. 
×
×
  • Create New...