Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Dear Motorsport Enthusiasts’

It comes with the deepest regret from all of us at the Valvoline Autofest Series that we send you this letter.

Due to circumstances beyond our control the 2011 Murray Bridge Autofest that was planned to take place over the weekend of January 29th and 30th now needs to be postponed until further notice.

Some of you are aware of this already, however out of respect for you and your past participation with our event; we deemed it only necessary to send you this letter formally. We apologise for what may seem as late notice and this will explain the reason for not receiving a notice announcing the Murray Bridge Autofest this year to you.

We want you to know that all the preparations were made to host the Murray Bridge Autofest that was scheduled for January 2011 and in no way is the event postponed due to lack of efforts made buy the Autofest organising committee or that of the Rural City of Murray Bridge.

Murray Bridge CEO Damien Moloney said; “The Rural City of Murray Bridge looks forward to working with the Autofest organizers and relevant stakeholders to ensure that the Autofest can continue to be held in Murray Bridge in the future. “

We look forward in announcing a new Event date early in the New Year and ensure that appropriate notice will be given so that all necessary accommodation and travel bookings can be made with minimum fuss.

We also look forward in working with the Rural City of Murray Bridge, Murraylands Tourism marketing, Murray Bridge business houses, Murray Bridge Accommodation Houses, Houseboat Hirers Association, Local Sporting Clubs and many others that have been all part in bringing this popular event to the wonderful City of Murray Bridge.

Sincerely,

Di Adams

For and on Behalf of

Murray Bridge Autofest

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/342888-murray-bridge-2011/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...