Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

FS: 1994 R33 Skyline GTS-T manual 4-door Sedan. Mild modifications listed below

INTERIOR

GTR front seats

Nismo 300km/hr speedometer

Apexi EL boost gauge pillar mounted

Trust Gearknob

Turbo Timer

Tinted windows

Genuine floor mat set

Kenwood flip-face CD player

Polk splits front

Alpine co-axial rear

EXTERIOR

Borbet german made 17x8 wheels with near new Dunlop Le-Mans 235x45x17 tyres

KYB lowered coilover suspension

Calsonic front strut brace

ENGINE

Apexi Power FC full engine management

Apexi Power Intake pod filter in custom insulated alloy cold air box

Turbosmart gated manual boost controller

Custom Mick’s Metalcraft front mount intercooler bar and plate with cast end tanks and mandrel bent aluminium piping. Core dimensions 600x300x75

Micks Metalcraft oil catch can

NGK Iridium plugs

HKS stainless dump pipe with split wastegate pipe into full 3” exhaust, hi-flow cat and Trust cat back system

GFB Hybrid BOV

Exedy Heavy duty single plate clutch with 2400lb pressure plate

All engine mods carried out within last 6 months. Car will be dyno tuned shortly. Usual options such as power windows/mirrors, climate control a/c, ABS and is also fitted with alarm system with automatic power window roll-up and boot release. Has 73,000 kms showing on clock. Have owned car for nearly 3 years averaged only 8,000km a year.

Serviced only with full synthetic oil. 6months rego. Very regretful sale due to another impending addition to the family. Located in SE QLD. Asking $23,000 email [email protected]

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/34330-fs-r33-gts-t-sedan/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Parts I will most likely sell would be

Power FC and HC

Power Intake and CAI

Front mount IC

BOV

nismo speedo

Apexi EL boost gauge

Trust gear knob

oil catch can

exhaust

boost controller

GTR seats

some of these I would have to do a deal with cash + original part eg Power Fc and seats.

As I said before I would prefer to sell car the way it is and will only do this if it does not sell in the next few months.

No worries Adrian, if I decide to do it, I'll let you know first before I post details. Could be a while though as I have to go away for work until the end of june, car will be put in a car yard for that time and if it does not sell I will do it then

No worries Adrian, if I decide to do it, I'll let you know first before I post details. Could be a while though as I have to go away for work until the end of june, car will be put in a car yard for that time and if it does not sell I will do it then

Suits me down to the ground... Best of luck with the sale!

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...