Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

As im saving month my month im at 3500 dollars so far for my rebuild.

So during the save time im constantly asking different people / workshops for opinions and i tell ya is insane so far ive been mind ($#$%) several times and need answers !

small facts b4 i explain - Rebuild is being forged internally head work im doing myself at work just putting in valve springs for later cam install bottom end so far is being done at EDGE by barry.

1. I was told standard rods are fine for 400-450 awkw not to use forged items because standard have oil squirters and forged do not this causes oil starvation (increased ware) on the new items...

2. dont port head (not going to anyway) but was told alot of people who have have gone bakwards

question is i thought the oil squirters were bolted to the block and the pistons need to be rb26 specific to clear the squirter ?

am i wrong or ?

neway if any1 has a good idea about what rods to use please let me know so i can get em if this oil squirter crap is true lol :) thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/359815-rebuilding-my-rb26-need-clue/
Share on other sites

If you look on the stock rod you'll see one side has a small hole coming from the main end journal that would squirt oil under the piston crown/ inner wall, this is in addition to the squirters bolted to the block. If you're using a forged piston which has better heat dissipation by design then I don't see how not having the stock rods for this purpose (oil cooling the pistons) would be too bad. Can't see how not having it would have any contribution to oil starvation, the oil squirts out of it away from the bearing...........

I really like the look of Tomei rods, they're about 1100 out of Japan at the moment. And maybe a little wait. I also like the look of Nitto. I also like the look of most shiny new trick-machined metal. I'm not aware of aftermarket rods for stock displacement that interfere with the squirters.

Stock rods are good for 400rwkw+ but you need to use ARP rod bolts and have the main ends of the rods re-sized after the bolts are installed.

As far as porting the head goes, I imagine it'll depend on what cams and turbo combination you have as to whether you get gains- for street-type setup I just relieve the excess 'bump' in the exhaust ports to create a smoother path to the port, it should improve response a bit if nothing else. (If you're using stock exhaust manifolds you can also port match the manifold to exhaust turbine for better response- helpful on a 2.6 with larger turbos).

If you look on the stock rod you'll see one side has a small hole coming from the main end journal that would squirt oil under the piston crown/ inner wall, this is in addition to the squirters bolted to the block. If you're using a forged piston which has better heat dissipation by design then I don't see how not having the stock rods for this purpose (oil cooling the pistons) would be too bad. Can't see how not having it would have any contribution to oil starvation, the oil squirts out of it away from the bearing...........

I really like the look of Tomei rods, they're about 1100 out of Japan at the moment. And maybe a little wait. I also like the look of Nitto. I also like the look of most shiny new trick-machined metal. I'm not aware of aftermarket rods for stock displacement that interfere with the squirters.

Stock rods are good for 400rwkw+ but you need to use ARP rod bolts and have the main ends of the rods re-sized after the bolts are installed.

As far as porting the head goes, I imagine it'll depend on what cams and turbo combination you have as to whether you get gains- for street-type setup I just relieve the excess 'bump' in the exhaust ports to create a smoother path to the port, it should improve response a bit if nothing else. (If you're using stock exhaust manifolds you can also port match the manifold to exhaust turbine for better response- helpful on a 2.6 with larger turbos).

good post with correct info.

not had any experience with this kit but my thoughts would be about the CP rings, I've heard of people having issue with them bedding in. You can get different rings to suit the CP's though I assume. If your power goal is around 400rwkw then you might not need the rods, if you wanted to track it regularly I'd be then considering them.

what else you got on the menu?

Edited by doo doo

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...