Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so after careful review, you aren't actually wrong about the last part, you are wrong about the first part.

The only reason you 'USE' more fuel at peak power is because the injector is doing it more times. Peak torque has a higher ratio of fuel usage per rpm compared to peak power. Which is why most fueling and ignition problems occur at around that time but become better as rpm increases.

So, yes, more fuel will physically leave your tank at peak power but you certainly have a higher demand for fuel at peak torque

What you just said is exactly what I said, including you using the ratio of fuel usage to rpm instead of what I said (which was just to say per cycle). So either we are both wrong about the first part I wrote or neither of us are, and I really prefer the latter.

Most ignition problems turn up at peak torque because BMEP is highest at that point, making the mixture harder to spark off.

A lot of fuelling problems turn up at peak torque because that's when it's likely to ping the worst (and hence where pinging will likely start to show), given that BMEP is highest then.

What you just said is exactly what I said, including you using the ratio of fuel usage to rpm instead of what I said (which was just to say per cycle). So either we are both wrong about the first part I wrote or neither of us are, and I really prefer the latter.

Most ignition problems turn up at peak torque because BMEP is highest at that point, making the mixture harder to spark off.

A lot of fuelling problems turn up at peak torque because that's when it's likely to ping the worst (and hence where pinging will likely start to show), given that BMEP is highest then.

I will quote that part you are wrong about:

"Now that's just untrue"

ok just an update didnt get a chance to do a fuel presure test as when i got hoe dad had taken the car but when he got back told me to take it for a run and the car is runing a lot better still has a little pop above 4500 rpm but its runing a lot better and is holding 7psi of boost now so might pull plugs out and check them and clean them and see if the gets rid of the little pop thanks for the help guys will let ya know how it goes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
    • I can donate $100 to your upgrade fund. So long as you can donate the IC7 my way....
    • I'd love a Haltech ECU, and Haltech 10 dash. Was having a chat with Rob and Andy @ Haltech when Rob put one in his MR2. First one I'm kind of interested in too, as you can dim it RIGHT down. Andy was saying bright dashes is one of his peeves too!
×
×
  • Create New...