Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is an excerpt from the Haltech website about fuel requirements and power levels.

If you can estimate the power output of a gasoline engine, you can make a reasonable guess at the fuel

flow requirement. A simple rule of thumb, thus, may be expressed in metric or imperial units.

Note: Every 100 hp needs around 50 lb/hr (8.0 US gal/hr) of fuel

(6.6 Imp gal/hr)

Every 100 kW needs around 670 cc/min (40 L/hr) of fuel

This assumes a brake specific fuel consumption of 0.50. The actual fuel flow necessary by injectors and

pump are likely to exceed a figure derived this way. This is due to the overheads in injector dead time and

pumping return fuel to maintain regulation.

I worked backwards with these figures and with my 910 cc injectors at 68 percent my power level came in at 554kw. This is at the flywheel I assume.

This seems a tad high. Who here can fill in some more information to get a more accurate power figure?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/382090-power-level-for-rb25det/
Share on other sites

Rough rule of thumb is 1cc per hp

Thats when working out what size injectors you need.

Working out power by injector duty, is a very rough guestimate at best as just a couple of degrees of timing either way will affect it pretty badly, same with AFR's / VE etc

My suggestion is take it to the 'Plex and see what the trap speed it ;)

Yeah I knew there would be a lot in the afr and the timing. I guess I better get it down the strip hey. I think the clutch might let it down a bit but I should get through there pretty quick. Top of 4th is 125mph. That's what it would do I spose.

All depends on if you actually get to the top end of 4th, and what RPM is used.

You can actually hit the limiter and still see a MPH increase in some instances, just depends how hard it hits.

Doesn't take a genius to workout though that the car doesn't have 554kw @ the fly with a GT35 so the figures provided initially are wrong, or the calculations are.

But ye for a RB 1hp = 1cc using the stock reg (for most intents/purposes). E85 obviously confuses this as do pressure adjustments.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry I haven't been following all the detail, so you may have tried this. Does it idle with the tiniest bit of throttle you can add? You've mentioned the IACV, does it have an AAC valve and have you adjusted it at all (ie, screw the idle adjust screw all the way in, then back it out a couple of turns until idle is stable)?
    • My bad, I unplugged the one underlined in red instead of yellow before. With the car started, after unplugging the IACV (the one underlined in yellow), it idled at around 400/500 for 3 seconds before stalling. Attempting to start the car without the IACV will not start the car.   It does stutter and sputter for around 5 seconds before dying. However, immediately after starting it, you can already hear some slight sputters from the exhaust.   It won't start with the AFM unplugged. If it is when the car has already started, it stalls in a few seconds.   Yesterday, I did take some logs using Nistune of 3 scenarios. Car idling till it stalls Car idling and unplugging the IACV Car idling and removing the AFM I also have some previous logs of when the Car is idling till it stalls and when driving and it cuts. I am not really knowledgeable enough to understand what to look for. After every test, car idles rougher and rougher, until I have to stop. It will be fine the day after.
    • There is no difference between a 17x8 and an 18x8. The total diameter of the tyre needs to remain +/- the same (so you don't mess up the gearing, speedo reading, and clearance when turning front wheels..... so you just need to use a lower profile tyre on th 18 than you do on the 17. /rocket surgery.
    • I thought the same to start with. But then I thought it was one of those LCAs where the end of the ARB goes through a bushing in the LCA itself, instead of having an end link.
    • Yeah - I mean, go the other way. Smaller range. Not larger.
×
×
  • Create New...