Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't say it was too rich. It's on the safer side (11.5:1), but I wouldn't say it's too rich. The power gains made by pulling 0.5 out of it to bring it too 12:1 wouldn't be worth it.

If you think your lacking power, then maybe have a close look at the ignition map.

J

Can you gurus have a look at the attached dyno chart and give any comments on the AFR i.e. is it too rich ?

Hi Jezzrr, let me start off by saying Steve knows his stuff, so the first thing I would do is ask him about the AFR's.

So to answer your question, for cars that we tune I would be aiming for slightly leaner ratios. I very rarely aim for less than 12 to 1 and I notice yours gets under 11.5 from 6,000 rpm onwards. Safety is an issue and there may be a valid reason why it is tuned that rich. It also may be a matter of tuning limitations, sensor out of resolution etc

Bottom line, ask Steve.

Hi Jezzrr, let me start off by saying Steve knows his stuff, so the first thing I would do is ask him about the AFR's.

So to answer your question, for cars that we tune I would be aiming for slightly leaner ratios.   I very rarely aim for less than 12 to 1 and I notice yours gets under 11.5 from 6,000 rpm onwards.  Safety is an issue and there may be a valid reason why it is tuned that rich.  It also may be a matter of tuning limitations, sensor out of resolution etc

Bottom line, ask Steve.

Sydney Kid,

Cheers for the reply, you rarely aim for less than 12 to 1, what do you aim for exactly 12/12.5/13 to 1 ?

Jeremy

Sydney Kid,

Cheers for the reply, you rarely aim for less than 12 to 1, what do you aim for exactly 12/12.5/13 to 1 ?

Jeremy

Hi Jeremy, a bit of philosophy first, otherwise my response might not make much sense. I use A/F ratios for safety not ignition timing, this is because I like to keep the response as fast as I can. Others may prefer to use ignition timing as the safety and sacrifice a bit a response so they can run higher A/F ratios.

Having said that, for a race car, I aim for 12.5, but it really depends on how close the detonation is. Some engines handle 12.5 easily, no knock at all, others are in the 30 to 40 range all the time. It is to do with the preparation of the engine, particularly combustion chamber size, shape and polish, with squish also being important. There is also the question of fuel, we can run 13 with Turbo Max but Optimax doesn't show as much gain up there. LMS is in between.

Plus we use a lambda sensor for each cylinder when tuning, this gives us a reliable A/F ratio for each cylinder. If you use a single lambda sensor then you get an average of all 6 cylinders, and some may be richer and some leaner than the average. Obviously all of the race cars have a lambda sensor fitting welded in each primary exhaust pipe.

For a road car, around 12 to 1 is my target, but again it very much depends on how close the detonation is. I check the individual A/F ratios with a pyrometer, but this is not as accurate as using lambda sensors. So on some cars you end up with an average of 11.5 as the best you can achieve. Often we find that the rear cylinders are lean and the front rich, so you have to tune to the leanest cylinder.

So it's not so straight forward, that's why I suggested you check with Steve, I am confident he will have sound reasoning.

The difficulty in Perth is that we dont get Optimax we can only get BP Ultimate 98 so that may explain why its run a little richer ?

That's OK, in Sydney we get Optimax sold as Ultimate.

To give you a different perspective again, I was told by a D1 Driver that they tune 11:1, and use timing to get good response.  This is how they tune their (Signal and Tinker drift club at least - that's who he drove for) cars.

I can understand that, for drifting, they need ultimate throttle response. Plus drift is very harsh on the engine, free spinning wheels, high rpm for long periods, rev limiter incursions, low airflow for radiator and oil cooler etc etc. They can't afford to be blowing engines all the time, so a bit of safety is essential. By "afford" I mean a blown engine in competition means you loose, plus the cost of fixing it, of course. You also need to remember that, in drifting, a few horsepower either way is not going to make any difference to the result, but poor throttle response sure is.

This is quite different to a drag car where every horsepower counts. It is not so different to circuit racing where throttle response is very import, but you can't afford to give away a horsepower advantage to the opposition either. You need to tune it for the intended purpose, that's why I always ask "and what are you going to use the car for?"

Horses for courses as they say.

Hi Boostd, we have had a change of control fuel in Production Car Racing this year to BP Ultimate. Previously the control fuel was the same batch of Shell Optimax used by the V8Dinosaurs. I have asked a number of times for access to Ultimate direct from BP and have been told that only WA and SA have Ultimate sourced from Kwinana and it is not economical to ship it from Perth to Sydney. So the Ultimate sold here is actually sourced from a "local refinery". Since only the Shell refinery has 98 capability "locally" then all the Ultimate sold in Sydney must be Shell.

I can tell you that the Shell refinery is very old technology and the batches can be quite different. Hence the reason why they made one batch and used that same batch for the whole season of dinosaur racing. This has been happening for a number of seasons now and they stick it in a tanker and send it to the races all over the country. It even goes to NZ for the race there. If (as a registered team) you want to do engine tuning or practise then you have to go direct to Shell and get a drum from this batch.

Maybe you have been a victim of the "different batches" problem.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Was going to say the car pulls up nicely everywhere, especially going into that last long right hander before the main straight. Looks like a lot of fun.
    • Hey Dave, welcome aboard! Good to see another soon-to-be Stagea owner here. The wagons are awesome — plenty of space, still got that Skyline DNA, and loads of potential if you’re into mods. Definitely post up pics when you get it, everyone here loves seeing new builds. What model/year are you looking at?
    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
×
×
  • Create New...