Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm concerned that my car is too low(was like that from Japan). I can barely fit my little finger through the gap between the guards and the tyre. I can fit a coke can under the car(standing up of course) at the lowest part so should be legal ride height.

How do Cops usually measure a car to be "too low"? Detailed explaination would be appreciated. Also I want it to handle at its optimum so is there a way to determine optimum ride height? Is optimum ride height based on damper and rebound of the shocks or am I looking at totally wrong areas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38796-optimum-ride-height-for-r32-gtr/
Share on other sites

but not sure.

Dont know what the OEm ride height is..

A few of the guys run 340-345 front and 340-350 rear. I tested our Targa Car the other day at 335 front and rear with DMS suspension, and it seemed OK, in fact i am tempted to run those setting in this TT.

Last year we ran Tein @ F=340 & R = 345, but the front was wrong spring rate.

Measure from centre of your wheel to bottom edge of wheel arch

As far a cops are concerned, check with the local authorities

TT

Well if that is the case, that is very low. Tein give a 90mm test bar for setting their suspension, which you put under the front of exhaust (Lowest Point)... That translates to 320mm ride height on a HCR32 with std wheels

TT

I'm concerned that my car is too low(was like that from Japan). I can barely fit my little finger through the gap between the guards and the tyre. I can fit a coke can under the car(standing up of course) at the lowest part so should be legal ride height.

How do Cops usually measure a car to be "too low"? Detailed explaination would be appreciated. Also I want it to handle at its optimum so is there a way to determine optimum ride height? Is optimum ride height based on damper and rebound of the shocks or am I looking at totally wrong areas?

Hi ecenshu;

My R32 GTR rides about R370mm F360mm measured from hub to guard lip with standard suspension.

'Optimum' ride height will vary depending upon what you want to use the car for, however, I understand that less than 350mm measured as above will cause you to upset the dynamic aspects of the suspension. You'll also need to adjust camber if you go lower than standard.

As far as I know the cops don't measure ride height, they measure ground clearance. The RTA should be able to assist with this, about 100mm sounds right.

You might also wish to call Whiteline suspension in Sydney for advice.

Regards

Not having any real experience with 1:1 scale cars, based on my knowledge of RC cars though:

A good setup for rough terrain(public roads) would be to have the car as low as possible with while maintaining maximum suspension travel. Also, go softest you can with the dampers and get the stiffest roll bars that you can put up with...however, there is a point where it is too soft and I think the standard damper rates would classify as the softest setting possible.

Do you think my reasoning is flawed? My opinion is to get dampers that are closest to the stock settings and maybe a bit stiffer to minimise roll to a certain extent. Anti-roll bars should be the controlling factor for body roll as stiff suspension would only be useful for tracks because theres not too many weight transitions on public roads...I can only think of roundabouts and I can't picture a stock GTR suspension settings with stiffer roll bars not being able to handle them :P

Lemme know what you think...

PS: would anyone know what the lowest ride height for a R32 GTR while still maintaining about 80% of the suspension travel would be?

Hi ecenshu, my thoughts (*) on what you've written are:

A good setup for rough terrain(public roads) would be to have the car as low as possible with while maintaining maximum suspension travel.

* Maximum suspension travel is relative to what you want to use the car for. How much do you need? You can have the car as low as you like provided your camber is OK and the available travel is sufficient. Height and suspension travel are related in the extreme sense, but actual travel will be different for a given spring rate and length, which is related to the next point.

Also, go softest you can with the dampers and get the stiffest roll bars that you can put up with...however, there is a point where it is too soft and I think the standard damper rates would classify as the softest setting possible.

*The dampers should be matched to the spring rate. If the dampers are too stiff the springs won't compress or rebound. I think if you used the stiff roll bar soft damper set up you'd get either over or understeer badly (?) depending upon the set up. Camber setting will also play a big part here. I don't believe roll bars should be used to do anything other than minimise roll and control over or understeer. The rest is up to shocks, springs, and alignment. I'm fairly sure that extremely stiff anti roll bars on their own will make the car a skate in the wet.

Do you think my reasoning is flawed? My opinion is to get dampers that are closest to the stock settings and maybe a bit stiffer to minimise roll to a certain extent. Anti-roll bars should be the controlling factor for body roll as stiff suspension would only be useful for tracks because theres not too many weight transitions on public roads...I can only think of roundabouts and I can't picture a stock GTR suspension settings with stiffer roll bars not being able to handle them :)

*You haven't mentioned springs here anywhere. Don't overlook them because they've got to be considered carefully. Body roll is only one factor, without it there can be as many problems as with too much as I understand it assists weight transfer and therefore grip as long as it's withn reasonable limits for the intended use.

Sorry I wasn't clear before, or I'm probably getting my terminoligy incorrect.

Car will be for street use and pending $$$ a circuit car. I said damper when I intended to mean the whole shock assembly, ie: matched springs to shocks.

Well I guess t get "maximum" suspension travel I'd end up with a landcruiser setup! :). I would like the car to be able to handle a pothole or two while cornering hard if thats too much to ask....

Preferable setup will be "firm" ride with some roll on the road so it doesn't skate or skip over ripples. Adjustable anti-roll bar will be stiffened when minimal roll is wanted.

Does this seem I'm thinking correctly? Or should/would I need to get a firm/stiff spring/damper combination to stop/minimise body roll?

Also, is it damping, rebound or spring rate that affects how much a car rattles your bones?

PS: I'm just a dumb car owner and don't know what I mean! :cheers:

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...