Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Those calipers originally come off a 280mm disc. Without using any adapters they will only suit a 280mm disc. If you use them on a 324mm disc they will need to be spaced outward (radially) using adapters. Note also, that a given caliper and pad really only suits a certain disc size (or at least a narrow range of disc sizes). The shape of the caliper's curve follows the outer cicumference of the rotor. If it is curved to suit a small disc, then it will tend toward hanging off the edge of a larger disc near the middle of the pad. I think that there are adapters to suit the R32 caliper onto 324mm disc, but I don't know what the resulting sweep of the pad over the disc looks like.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6198702
Share on other sites

I've seen sumitomo calipers sitting over variety of rotor sizes using spacers. The most common conversion is 280->324 rotor for obvious reasons, but there are more options out there. Whether they're worth doing is debatable, but since you asked about different options and the biggest possible rotor, here goes:

- There are adapters for 330x32mm rotors, front rotors off V36 skyline/skyline crossover are probably the cheapest option in that size, but you can use two-piece rotors with 332x32 brembo or stoptech friction rings with custom hats.

- Then there are adapters intended for 334x30mm rotors off a lexus GS. Rotor requires slight modifications.

- Adapters for 340mm rotors I saw once were a one-off item, so worth mentioning only because it can be done.

- UAS had an adapter kit to use with 343mm two-piece rotors, but it's apparently no longer available

- There are kits that use 345x32mm rotor off a Merc ML55 AMG, see attached pic. Silvias had 280x30 front brakes from factory, just like the ones you bought, but with steel calipers, so the pic is relevant. Rotors are cheap but have to be modified.

- The biggest kit I've ever seen was R34 Gtt caliper (310x30mm factory size, pad shape same as yours) sitting over V36 skyline sport 355x32mm rotor, see second and third attached pics

For rears there are spacers for GTR34 322 rotors, V36 330mm and 350mm rotors

post-36390-0-26788500-1327180478_thumb.jpg

post-36390-0-16429400-1327180525_thumb.jpg

post-36390-0-12740700-1327180564_thumb.jpg

Edited by Legionnaire
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6198969
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

You would't want to - they weight a tonne each (I think it's mass is close to 14kg, but can measure when I have time), offest is wrong for most wheel designs, and they require 18" wheels. Also you can use smaller rotors and get just as good braking as with these - cooling and pads with higher friction are your friends. There is a guy here who races his R32 with R34GTT calipers and factory-sized rotors.

Other than that - yes, as per GTSBoy's post, caliper adapters are needed. 280->324mm adapters might work, and you'll 100% have to file the edges of your calipers to make them sit lower on the rotor, see attach

post-36390-0-16959000-1331723885_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6274639
Share on other sites

Depends on what result you're really after. If higher brake torque and faster deceleration is what you desire, then starting with rotor size is a poor approach.

If you enjoy the look of massive and shiny chunk of cast iron behind the rims, then it's a good way (not as good as two piece rotors, but still not bad), but keep wheel size and offset considerations in mind.

If you want both, then you're in for big buck expenditure :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6274827
Share on other sites

Rofl. You're telling me.

I'm at the end of my wits with Endless, Brembo, etc... So expensive...

Don't get me wrong, one day I'll have 8k-10k of brakes under there, but for now, I'd be happy with stopping power... having said that, tiny rotors will look balls under the 18' TE's. :(

Edit:

Looks like I'll just be getting good (although still 310mm) rotors and good pads and leaving it at that for now...

Edited by Idaten
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6274848
Share on other sites

You don't necessarily have to spend 8-10K on the brakes in order to have nice calipers and good braking, you just have to do a bit of research and think outside the box a little.

E.g. a set of rear calipers off an Audi R8 would make a good upgrade for the fronts - just an example.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6275028
Share on other sites

I'll admit I'd never have thought of that, but that's probably because it's SO far out of the box.

Honestly, without a million different cars sitting next to mine to test fit, I'd have no idea which calipers would fit. Just a bit vague in that area. Probably why I was opting for bolt-ons.

I love the suggestion though and will try to search the web for some different examples.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6276248
Share on other sites

A few general tips on what to look for:

1)you'll unlikely find something that would bolt straight up to the hub, so look for calipers that have radial mount holes (parallel to rotor surface), not axial mounts. This makes adapters much easier and cheaper to fabricate

2)look for calipers that take common and readily available pad shape. There is no point in buying a set of calipers and then discover that you have to order a set of pads from the only place that sells them half the earth away, and you need to sell your kidney to buy them and wait for a couple of months for delivery.

3)look for calipers that has variety of pad compounds available for it. This is not exactly same as previous point, because not all common pad shapes have high-performance pads available. And vice versa - not all common pad shapes are available in street compounds.

4)look out for pad friction patch (also known as radial depth, pad swept area, annulus, etc), as a pad too wide/too narrow/oddly shaped can limit your selection of rotors big time

5)look out for rotor thickness and diameter that calipers are intended for. This can also limit your rotor options or effectively make your brake "upgrade" an actual downgrade, say when you buy beautiful calipers that take rotor only 16mm thick

6)calipers should be common enough (or use internals that are common) to be easily rebuildable/refurbishable. Calipers that cost, say, 2k new, can be found for 500 in average or poor shape, but will perform just like new when you throw two $50 rebuild kits at them

Well, those are the gudelines. And try to do lots of reading and develop general understanding for brakes, so you could understand what you really need and why, and tell whether a particular set of calipers is suitable for you. SAU contains wealth of knowledge on the topic, but is not the only source of info.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/388962-rotor-size/#findComment-6276253
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...