Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi guys im after sum help/info on a exedy xtreme daiken clutch part no: R5028NHD.

my car runs 210kw and just want to know if this will be ok to use and handle the power?ive searched google and the exedy website and i cant find out much about it so any help would be great

this is the only info i could find:

There are two heavy duty organic kits. First one is part no:

( R5028NHD ). Which is a new assembly the cover is pivot modified for increased clamp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/405267-r33-daiken-clutch-r5028nhd-infohelp/
Share on other sites

Just when you think life has become easy by having all the information provided, someone pops a curve ball at you and you scratch your head

The NSK-7056HD is the only Heavy duty part number Exedy list. There are sports organics and other heavy duty options but they are all 7056 except the Hyper metal range. Your part number is incorrect.

Get the NSK-7056HD - it will serve you well at those power levels - as has been mentioned dozens and dozens of times on this site

The part number is correct but it is a daiken part number and now that exedy has taken over daiken id say they have changed them all so i might have to ring exedy and see if they have a cross reference to the old numbers

You are referring to a part number that is something like 15 years old. NSK-7056HD is the current number.

NSD-098U clutch plate was in the R5028NDH kits (over 10 years ago). These days you can save some money and buy the NSK-6797HD kit which will do the same thing

ok cool cause the clutch kit i have is brand new and the clutch plate in the box is part no:nsd-098u which is in the r5028ndh kit.sorry mate i was under the impression that exedy had taken over i wasnt tryn to be a smart ass.so is the clutch kit i have any good?will it last a while and will i be expecting a heavy peddle?thanks heaps for the info uve been a great help.

I know you're not being a smart ass. That part number is not one used by anyone any more - although some catalogues still contain the old numbers for this reason I think.

The clutch you have should be ok for 240-250rwkw safely for a few years. Pedal feel should be heavier than standard and definitely a lot heavier than your worn out standard clutch

i have a exedy cushon button clutch at the moment will peddle feel be similar?will this suit my r33 cause the nsk 6797 exedy clutch u are referring to on the exedy website says it is suitable for r31 and r32 but not mine.sorry for all the questions

i have a exedy cushon button clutch at the moment will peddle feel be similar?will this suit my r33 cause the nsk 6797 exedy clutch u are referring to on the exedy website says it is suitable for r31 and r32 but not mine.sorry for all the questions

Yes the pedal feel will be similar pressure but slightly less bitey than the cushion button.

The NSK-6797 is exactly the same clutch but the centre hub has large single springs from memory. The NSD-098U clutch plate has smaller double springs in the hub.

It could be the other way around though it's been a while since I cared enough to look. Both are equally as good and both will hold the same power. The double spring one is softer to drive on compared to the heavier single spring variety but it's really not noticeable

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...