Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've ended up in a stupid situation Where I can't Identify what security system I have installed in my car.

This is a problem because my Remote controls are starting to fail; all I really need to do is get hold of some replacements; but obviously need the info to start down that path.

I did have it installed professionally a couple of years ago, but wasn't given full documentation on what was installed. I never thought about it but after getting under the dash and having a look; i'm slowly starting to think I was overcharged for a shit job.

Obviously first thing to do is go back to where it was installed, and I did that. Basically the bloke doesn't wanna know. He's busy, there's no money in this for him; And he reckon's he didn't even do a job, that somebody else did.

He did offer to install a completely new non Australian system for cheap instead, at which point I've kind of walked away without any intention of going back.

I can Identify certain things. the remotes for example are TX-111's, and they do have a code on the back.

the modules under dash are supposedly Alarm/Immobiliser/GPS combo to Aus standard.

Unfortunately they don't seem to stamp model numbers on the devices (perhaps for obvious reasons.)

Is there anyone that can start me down the path with this?

Just thought I'd put in a pic. Unfortunately I don't have the whole book, they tore off the front page.


1001_zps86adc355.jpg

I can PM people with some of the more technical info, but don't want to put up anything publically that i shouldn't :P

I've just noticed a number in the corner of the PIN card which is 'Dyn xxxxxx' which makes me think this thing is a dynatron....

Edited by Little

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...