Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all, just looking for a bit of help from anyone familiar with the latest g4 software to help us get started.

Firstly my intentions are to simply run the car at idle, check over for any issues, ( I've assembled the engine, a factory motor with bolt ons) and will then be taken to a tuner to be dynoed. My auto sparky friend is doing the work wiring wise, and we're using an r34 g4 plugin ecu. He has done this previously with wire in ecu's using slightly older software.

Where we've come unstuck is setting the initial parameters for the ecu, i.e which map sensor, tps, timing etc. Can anyone point out where to bring down the anologue input tree? We've been clicking options - setup ecu parameters - which brings up anologue inputs. But we can't find the right options there for selecting the correct map sensor just options to setup limits of sensors.

Any insight or input would be greatly appreciated. Again, we won't be tuning the car, simply running and checking over for leaks or issues, which I'll sort before dropping to tuner. Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433078-link-g4-pre-start-setup/
Share on other sites

Thanks guilt toy. I'm pretty sure this is what we are bringing up and it lists off all the inputs. But clicking on the map input brings up parameter properties, but there's no option to input what map sensor is installed. Are we missing a step before this? or should we be looking under another input? Have tried all the ones we thought were relevant, but brings up the same screen. We have selected the base map for standard r34 gtt. Again thanks for any help anyone can offer.

There should be a bar permanently on the left hand side of the screen for 'ECU Settings'

This is where you go to analog inputs to setup your sensors.

If it is not there then go to view (up the top) --> ECU Settings

This will bring up the parameters you need. Analog inputs in there is where you will find what your looking for

Keep in mind that my Link G4 base map had some of the inputs and outputs in the wrong spots (think the CAS was set as an output or something weird)

There is information to check everything in the help file, under the wiring or model specific information from memory

Thanks guilt toy. I'm pretty sure this is what we are bringing up and it lists off all the inputs. But clicking on the map input brings up parameter properties, but there's no option to input what map sensor is installed. Are we missing a step before this? or should we be looking under another input? Have tried all the ones we thought were relevant, but brings up the same screen. We have selected the base map for standard r34 gtt. Again thanks for any help anyone can offer.

I'm a bit confused about where you are looking, because it sounds like it's the right place. But it's very obvious once you are in there, so maybe you are in the wrong place. So I've attached a screen shot I took.

post-61550-0-88495800-1381396775_thumb.jpg

I'm a bit confused about where you are looking, because it sounds like it's the right place. But it's very obvious once you are in there, so maybe you are in the wrong place. So I've attached a screen shot I took.

attachicon.gifPCLink1.jpg

If you hit 'Parameters' on the side of the box with all the settings you will see the section he has gotten in to

Thanks for the help guys. Yes that is the screen we're in, but there's no option to change the type of map sensor. Another thing i'm wondering is if I've downloaded the correct software. The links a couple days old so I assumed it's the most up to date firmware g4. The other possible issue, is we tried the calibrate map sensor before realized had to select the correct sensor, so also going to try restore and start again. Will update how we go. Thanks

Well that's where your tuner had set it up or how it is on 33's. On the 34 GTT base map it is in the AN Volt 4 position. Not that its too critical, it's gonna be there somewhere and there's only gonna be one map sensor.

Yeah it may be different on other models, was just saying where it is and whats in it basically. I think thats why my settings were all out, because its an r33-r34 base map that is included with the download

The screen above shows you can either select a map sensor or use calibration tables to enter your own values

Yeah has worked resetting the ecu. I'm not sure if we'd changed some oddball setting somewhere else but it wasn't coming up like the screenshots you guys have taken. It is now. I'll leave now for sparky friend to come help. Thanks for your input and advice. One more q for everyone. The base 34 tune is for a standard car correct? Will I be doing any harm in running my car with it? Again will just be idled, not driven. It's running 666cc injectors, which I'm assuming will over fuel quite a bit. Cheers guys

Shouldnt do any harm just idling, though with 666cc injectors you might have a hard time getting it to idle. Will probably work long enough to check for fuel leaks if that is your intention. Injector settings are quite easy to change in the Link though, you could try adjusting them to get it to idle better. If you can't get it to work then just reload the base map, no harm done.

Pretty confident with the fuel side not leaking. I've also installed an oil cooler, I made the braided lines up so bit anxious about them. And installed a radiator header reservoir, there's ended up a few very hard to reach hoses associated with that under the plenum. and oil/water lines around the top mounted turbo. Touchwood, I've taken my time, and had a bitta experience with cars, but this car has alotta money tied up in it. Would be a bit let down if I fail at the end hurdle. All going well will finish the ecu pre start checks tomorrow, and look at firing it up.

Also the way I understand it there's a scaling option associated with the fueling tables? We could adjust this to help idle without changing individual values?

Cheers

For idle I think it would be easier to adjust the injector values. The scaling tables are based on the master value, so if that isn't right then you could be doing a lot of adjusting and guess work trying to get it to run. What injectors are they?

Siemens. When I bought the computer the tuner recommended them. I still needed a set, thought he wouldn't suggest something they weren't getting good results with. He did recommend standard replacement r35 injectors, saying they were bolt in 560cc I think, but were twice the price. I'll see what happens, hopefully don't need to adjust anything. Also forgot it's Bathurst today, haven't watched whole race for couple years now, but like to watch some of it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...