Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a RB25DET Series 2 in my USDM 240sx S13. The motor has 30k on it and is healthy. I right now have the stock SMIC, but within about 2-3 weeks I am going to be putting on a Pro-Charger FMIC that will be able to support up to 800HP. My question is I have heard that the stock turbo can handle more boost if it has low miles on it and is healthy. I know it has a ceramic wheel and is held on the shaft by a strong glue and over time with high amounts of boost will break apart and shoot the turbine wheel out the exhaust. I am running 10psi right now, but plan on taking it up to 15psi once I get the FMIC on there. Do you guys think I will be safe with the turbo only having 30,000 miles on it?

How long do you think the turbo will last?

I will have a T3/T04e .63ar on it by next summer, so I am not going to be running the stock turbo for that much longer.

Let me know,

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44417-sii-rb25det-turbo/
Share on other sites

the stock turbo runs out of efficiency at 10-12 psi so there is no point.. and there are plenty of people with experience that shows that the stock turbo wont last long if your boost it higher than 12 psi..

it will last even less with the stock cooler, once u add the fmic it will be safer to run that boost and it will make more power. (lower pressure drop)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44417-sii-rb25det-turbo/#findComment-908314
Share on other sites

the stock turbo runs out of efficiency at 10-12 psi  so there is no point.. and there are plenty of people with experience that shows that the stock turbo wont last long if your boost it higher than 12 psi..

it will last even less with the stock cooler, once u add the fmic it will be safer to run that boost and it will make more power. (lower pressure drop)

From what I have been told it is pretty much the same turbo specs as the S15 T28, added on the T3 flang, ceramic wheel, and different make.

I know the T28 are found to go up around 17psi and still be efficeint.

What is limiting the RB25 turbo to only 12psi?

So by adding on the FMIC you think it will be a dramatic power change from the stock SMIC?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44417-sii-rb25det-turbo/#findComment-908342
Share on other sites

Before you crank up the boost beyond 12 PSI You should look into some kinda fuel controller to get maximun perfromance from the increase boost. I ran my SII Motor at 12 PSI stock IC and no Managment without any problems. I am sure it would have made more power with some fuel taken out up top. I now have a 56 Trim T3/T4 on the car and I am still running stock SMIC and stock ECU. At 9 psi the car will hit boost cut every so often. I have an FMIC + PFC on it's way so I can start to make some real power.

Anywho.....Run 10-12 PSI and you will be fine. Anymore boost then that and you are starting to ask for trouble.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44417-sii-rb25det-turbo/#findComment-908347
Share on other sites

From what I have been told it is pretty much the same turbo specs as the S15 T28, added on the T3 flang, ceramic wheel, and different make.

I know the T28 are found to go up around 17psi and still be efficeint.

What is limiting the RB25 turbo to only 12psi?

So by adding on the FMIC you think it will be a dramatic power change from the stock SMIC?

The RB25DET turbos have a ceramic-type exhaust wheel, and as far as I understand at high speeds/temps they can break off and head off for more carnage - so its not just efficiency thats not going to be ideal.

But on efficiency, as far as I understand a turbo's efficiency is measured on turbine rpm vs. air type scale - so maybe an RB25DET demands in the same area of turbine rpm from the turbine for 12psi as an SR20DET does to be pressurised to 17psi, being a bigger motor and all.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/44417-sii-rb25det-turbo/#findComment-908354
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...