Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So who's playing? I picked up mine on the way to work tonight and won't be able to give it a go until friday.

Any PC users experiencing the glitchy, jumpy graphic issues that are being reported?

I'm watching a mate play it now on his laptop and he hasn't had an issue yet. But in saying that, another mate is having big issues while running 2 gtx980 titans in SLI.

From what I've seen for far, the game looks freaking awesome.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/457774-batman-arkham-knight/
Share on other sites

Is this the one that came out on PS4 as well (released midnight the night before last)? My son picked his up yesterday morning and absolutely loves it (was up till after midnight playing last night with a mate). That's all I know - I only play driving games, so don't get into any of that other stuff.

Benchmark ran nicely on my build.

Gameplay is very poor though, doesn't feel smooth at all and and I need to have setting very low for the build I have.

Most other AAA titles run High to Ultra detail 2560x1600 at 60fps+

Terrible port, very inefficient or poorly optimized.

My new card arrived today so i'll install that when I get home tonight and see how it runs on full settings.

I'm playing it on all low settings at the moment with my current card and it struggles (only a 1GB card so I was expecting it)

From what I've read of the last patch, most things should be fixed.

Can't wait to play it on proper graphics

I'm loving the game at moment.

The story is excellent as well as the game play.

The plot twists in the story have been crazy, would never have picked them. They have really stepped it up to finish the series off.

Also I haven't had any of the graphic problems at all. The new card is running like a dream.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...