Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently fired up my S1 R25DE+T, engine has received alot of work over the last 6 months including larger turbo, injectors, fresh gaskets throughout etc..

First time starting with new setup and eprom tune.

Runs pretty good, still have a few little things to sort but its all there.

The engine now runs 550cc RX-7 injectors with walbro 255 LPH pump and adj pressure reg.

Its sometimes hesitant to start, I believe its putting too much fuel into the engine whilst cranking, I deleted the cold start valve when I did the new setup but am now thinking of putting in back in, I have done a resistance test on it and its perfect according to my R32 workshop manual, will this aid in supplying less fuel to the engine on start up? Or put the engine in open loop and put even more fuel in? basically, Will this help the engine start?

Any info/help is great as start up is really the only issue, it currently has no O2 sensor but I will be putting a new NTK item in over the next few weeks with new downpipe, vehicle has only idled/lightly revved so far.

Cheers :)

The cold start valve lets air into the system. So it has absolutely no effect on how much fuel is injected. If you actually do have too much fuel at cranking time, then letting more air in won't be a bad thing.

The best thing you can do is do a Nistune ECu at least (or some other programmable jobbie) and deal with the starting mixture issue directly.

And the next best thing to do would be get some at least half decent injectors rather than those old heaps of shit in there now

The build was done on a planned budget so I only had x amount to spend on each item, 6 x 666cc or 1000cc bosh injectors go for $660 & $780 respectively here, IDs are no cheaper.. I picked these up for $280 shipped, have you actually thrown a pair of 20 year old JECS into a injector bench tester before? Hardly "old heaps of shit"..

The cold start valve lets air into the system. So it has absolutely no effect on how much fuel is injected. If you actually do have too much fuel at cranking time, then letting more air in won't be a bad thing.

The best thing you can do is do a Nistune ECu at least (or some other programmable jobbie) and deal with the starting mixture issue directly.

Cheers GTSBoy.. Was originally going with a Nistune board as I can get them for a really sharp price here in NZ.. But due to study Im forced to sell the 32 and clear up funds.. Most people would sell the car as is but im one of those anal pricks and want top dollar haha

Actually, they are. It's not the quality of the spray pattern at high flow that has improved....it is how well they work at low pulse widths that is better with the newer injectors.

I know the modern fuel-injector has a far improved idle (low pulse width and duty cycle) Im just not willing to write them off as "old heaps of shit"?? Tuned correctly, Idle isnt bad with older injectors, (remember were talking late 80s/early 90s JECS here) and as previously discussed, spray-pattern/atomizing of fuel at high duty cycle and pulse width is fine. My point is, this is a S1 RB25+T running a factory-like setup to achieve a simple 200-220 KW on low boost, not a built RB26 aiming for 400KW for example, spending $800-$1000 on injectors is foolish when one can get a set of S5 RX7 550cc injectors and dyno tuned Nistune board for $1200?

Edited by Paulusc44

Well, to still keep refuting your point....once you buy some old dinosaur injectors, then get them cleaned and tested, you are most of the way to a set of brand new modern injectors. Using 2nd hand injectors without a clean and test is a lottery I'm not willing to play with an engine I care enough about to modify.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...