Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering if anyone else has a knocking sound on there car while it idles. i'm looking at buying a car that does...apparently had it for past 10,000km drives really well. i've read past posts and people say it goes away when u press the clutch but i havent tried this as i dind't think of that when i checked it out. it's like a rhythmic knocking sound. it got checked by RACV comprehensive check and they said they couldn't tell me wat it was without removing the whole thing and they weren't aloud to do that coz i don't own the car. any help on wat it could be and how expensive it wud be to fix would be great. thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/48467-knocking-sound-on-idle/
Share on other sites

I had a smillar noise on idle which came from the timing case. Took it some where and was told it was probably the belt. It did in fact work out to be the belt (timing belt) which was loose causing it to knock on the cover. They replaced the belt and tensioner and cost $500. Nearly asked for an ambulance mind you. F---in rip off.

wat gets me is that the RACV comprehensive mechanic check couldn't tell me wat it was...without taking removing belt/s to locate. they said it was coming from the drive belt area...is that the same as u???

probably but the report says something bout having to "remove belt/s to locate"...u think he means that it could be that...probably some stupid old man mechanic who doesn't know wat a skyline is...i'm jsut really worried i'm gonna buy this thing with ll my money and end up having to shell out another $1,000 to fix it. how much should i pay for a timingblet change in Melb. the clock says 85,000kms so maybe/most likely wound back and is due for timingblet change as it hasn't been done and the cars been here for 2 years...so

I was worried about buying my car too at the time so i took my mate who is a mechanic. He could only see the basics ie wierd noises, panel damage etc. Good idea to try and get somebody who actually knows about skylines because my friend didn't see a couple of things. EG the aircon belt was missing ended up costing 1000 for complete new system. And the timing belt soon after. Car had 60000km on it when i bought it but somehow dont believe it. As i said you did the right thing by getting an RACV check but if you know someone who knows about skylines get them to check it out.

As for timing belt cost. The belt $100 The tensioner $90-100. And about 3 to 4 hours labour max. So anywhere from 50-70 roughly per hour. I would have gone somewhere else but the work shop just took it upon themselves to do the work then tell me it was ready. Oh yeah was told the timing belt is the same as a VL. But double check.

thanks so much for ur help... is there any way i can check if it's gonna be the timing belt. like a test or something. i think everything else on the car is alright...cept for a few minor problems...water gettin into the boot...panels got repaired except they didn't replace the rubber properly. basically just little things afta that. i'll see how it goes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...