Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

From what I gather, the issue will be emissions compliance. The engine is not a factory delivered unit and its won't be running factory management/maps. Therefore it hasn't met any emissions standards, anywhere.

The million dollar question is how do you prove emmissions compliance so that an engineer will be statisfied and sign the conversion off. I'll post up my engineers response.

The idea of not disclosing everything to an engineer when having the car signed off seems rather ridiculous to me:

* If the engine is the only part being certified, but you arn't telling the engineer everything then you are effectively paying the engineer to provide an engineering certificate that is void. I can think of better ways to spend my money.

* If you slip things past the engineer you will probably be able to get the car through roadworthy as well. So why bother spending the money on an engineering cert?

* If there are a number of things being certified its most cost effective to have everything done at once rather than coming back a second time after getting a defect or being turned down for a pink slip.

A few questions and answers from an email I sent to my local signatory....

Q: What about modifying factory ECU's via LS1 EDIT/chip changes or similar?

A: Strictly speaking, LS1 Edit and similar cracking is deliberate tampering with emission control equipment. Likewise changing the chip.

If the system was edited then put through a full ADR drive cycle test and passed, then it would be legal as long as the alteration software was not available to anyone that might service, tune or alter the vehicle.

Q: What about programmable management that can be password protected so it can't be changed by the owner?

A: Must be made tamper proof. This is probably technically okay provided that it is followed by a full ADR emission test...

Q: Can't you just take an emissions test?

A: The RTA can't work out whether their own test complies or not. The staff at the IM240 facilities say that IM240 is an acceptable alternative to the full ADR test. Emmanuel Kanna from the RTA's head office says no, and since I have that in writing, I have to say no also... Most engineers have not been told no by the RTA and hence accept IM240.

Q: What if I have an auto and want to convert it to manual, do I need to use the manual ECU?

A: Yes. And change any other emission control equipment to match the manual

spec. Except that EGR cannot be removed. So a factory manual HZ Holden 253 auto has no EGR, the auto does but an auto engine converted to manual must retain it.

Gets a bit iffy when you convert something like a 1UZ-FE to manual - there is no factory manual computer...

Q: What about if I put the std management in for engineering and then replace it with something aftermarket?

A: The engineer is only responsible for the vehicle in the condition that it was in at the time of inspection. Not my problem when it gets defected later and fined $25K. :-)

Q: What if a copy of the ECU settings are attached to the engineering/emissions report?

A: Does that prevent tampering? No? Then how does it accomplish the anti-tampering requirements of the ADRs?

If combined with effective anti-tampering that made the computer effectively read-only, it might be relevant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't understand how this hasn't boiled down to - Upgrade the turbo when you have everything required. ECU, injectors, fuel pump, turbo, etc. Do it all at once.  If you don't have everything required, just enjoy the car as it is and keep saving up your pennies. 
    • Sounds like you've got an interesting adventure ahead here with local support if you have trouble! My guess is that, unboosted, you will be OK with a small upgrade like -9. What will happen is that once the stock ECU sees more airflow than it expects it will add a heap of fuel and pull a heap of timing to be safe because it can't understand how it could get that much air without there being an issue. You will see clouds of black smoke and it won't pull hard through the midrange and top end. So, overall it will be a bit frustrating but should be OK. If you are still nervous set the base timing back 2o through the CAS, but it will be even more sluggish everywhere. As said above through...this is not my guarantee your engine won't be blown into a million pieces, leaving you looking for very hard to find parts A better idea is get a computer with logging ASAP, wire in a wide band O2 sensor and a use remote tuner. I've done multiple cars this way and while it is not as good as a specific tune on a dyno they can get it 90% right. I'd suggest if you can afford an R33 GTR these days you can afford an ECU and tune. And if you can't afford that you sure won't be able to afford the rebuild if it goes bad in the meantime,.  
    • Yeah it would be nice if someone took the time to put that sort of information together, but there are a lot of variations in looms. I think you are making this way hard for yourself if you just want to get it running....sourcing an SR20 with the right wiring will be a billion times easier than matching the RB loom to an S15 chassis. If you do end up going this way, you just need to trace every wire in the loom with a multimeter, 95% of them will go to a location you can confirm at the ECU.....and then post it up for the next person who needs it  
    • Just top it up with water, and keep a general idea of how much you added. It is normal for water to be pushed into and pulled out of the reservoir through the cap, and it should not be more than half full or it will be likely to overflow when hot. Any decent mechanic can do a pressure test of the cooling system to confirm if you have a leak. Keep in mind if it is only leaking a little and when hot it may well evaporate before you see it hit the ground
    • I'd ask the shop what they used and use that. Mixing coolants is sometimes OK, sometimes not, and you have know the details of each coolant to know whether it's a good idea or not.
×
×
  • Create New...