Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I just filled in the form for an online quote for a gst-t and they replied by saying that cover for the gts-t is under review due to "lack of available parts" , and weren't allowed to give any quotes untila decision is made.

what a crock of shit

there's only one reason why its under review, and we all know lack of available parts is not the reason

they should at least come clean and say why they really don't want to insure them

damn media influce, irresponsible drivers, and theives -> least he's goin to jail:D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5173-rac-are-scum/
Share on other sites

Give em a call or see them face to face, myself aswell as many others have RAC insurance. Thats one advantage of the net.... you can post stuff up like that and not have to worry about taking abuse from a potential client!!!

If still no then go to your local RAC and if they say the same kick up a bit of a stink....

At least this way you have tried and not just let it be.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5173-rac-are-scum/#findComment-79580
Share on other sites

I'm with RAC too and recently moved house, they said my new place has reduced my premium YAY! by a whopping $55 (from 2200/year to 2150/year) big hairy deal.

The problem is they sent me the papers confirming the new premium and it says "1992 NISSAN SYLINE GTR COUPE 6 CYLINDER, 2500cc" but I told 'em it was a '93 GTST.

Now I'm dreading calling 'em up to correct this incase they say "Oh, I'm sorry we don't insure GTSTs anymore". BASTARDS!

Do you think they'll refuse a claim (god forbid I need to make one) if the policy states an R32 GTR when I actually have an R33 GTST?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5173-rac-are-scum/#findComment-79651
Share on other sites

Calling them to get a positive result on the insurance probably wont help. I am insured with them, and when I rang with a general question about my policy they told me that when my policy comes up for renewal - they wont run with it anymore - too expensive they said.:confused: Time to start looking elsewhere

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5173-rac-are-scum/#findComment-79799
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Jon R33

I'm with RAC too and recently moved house, they said my new place has reduced my premium YAY! by a whopping $55 (from 2200/year to 2150/year) big hairy deal.

The problem is they sent me the papers confirming the new premium and it says "1992 NISSAN SYLINE GTR COUPE 6 CYLINDER, 2500cc" but I told 'em it was a '93 GTST.

Now I'm dreading calling 'em up to correct this incase they say "Oh, I'm sorry we don't insure GTSTs anymore". BASTARDS!

Do you think they'll refuse a claim (god forbid I need to make one) if the policy states an R32 GTR when I actually have an R33 GTST?

change it they will do, thats what they did with mine

they had to put the gtst back on the system.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5173-rac-are-scum/#findComment-79851
Share on other sites

Originally posted by skyzerr33

change it they will do, thats what they did with mine

they had to put the gtst back on the system.

100 percent correct there dude! I think a lot of us Gtst owners were insured as 32 GTR's, so quite a few of us had to change with no hassles. better off changing coz they do ANYTHING to get out of paying you if something goes wrong!!

If you wanna see em pack there dacks do what i did!

Me "Hi I'm interested in insuring a GTR/Supra here is my client number......."

RAC "Oh yes Daniel i have your details here, is that supra you want to buy a turbo or non turbo?"

Me: "Supra will be twin turbo "

RAC: "We don't insure twin turbo's we have a strict policy BLAH BLAH BLAH"

Me: " THEN WHY HAVE YOU INSURED ME AS A GTR TWIN TURBO!"

RAC " Oh Ummm AAhhh Yes Sir, it seems there was an operator error when putting it in, I will correct it for you straight away sir"

Me "Hmmm strict policy?"

RAC "terribly sorry our apologies"

ehehe always good for a laugh!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5173-rac-are-scum/#findComment-79885
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...