Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

Anyone out there encountered (and solved) the following problem;-

I have a late R32 GT-R equipped with a HKS EVC 2 boost controller. I've owned it for a while now and after fitting a microtech LTX12 and tuning it makes 260rwkW on around 17psi, so it's obviously pretty healthy mechanically.

Problem is though, the power surges in 3rd or higher under moderate to heavy acceleration, annoyingly, making the car feel far slower than 460hp, when boost is controlled by the EVC (not, though, when the EVC is in 'off' [green or 'monitor'] mode, and boost at standard wastgate actuated levels). It would probably do it in 1st and 2nd gear too, but you tend to not stay in them for long when you're up it for rent.

I assume that this is caused by the solenoid in the EVC not pulsing the boost signal properly to the wastgate actuators. I do have the manual [$20 for a piss-poor copy; thanks BDS's- not] and have followed every setup/trouble shooting step;-

*Wastgate type is set correctly

*Unit has been calibrated as per instructions, twice (could it be any more tedious)

*Everything seems connected properly, as far as I can tell

*The filters to the solenoid unit are dead clean

*The unit is in the same place, but replacing, the factory solenoid (so heat shouldn't be a problem)

*Even tried setting the unit up with learning function cancelled, in 'manual' mode

I went back to BD4's and Paul had a fiddle, mentioning some stuff about base settings, offset, overboost and all that (didn't want to road test though). Anyway, I made the recomended changes and initially it seemed to work, but I, obviously, couldn't really give it any stick around Gladesville in 3rd gear. When I got out onto the freeways, I still had the same problem. None of the "Experts" seem to know or care how to fix it ("Hey, how 'bout we supply and install and SooperBoost Y2K for ya"), like most of you, I've already spent a packet on the car and would just like to solve something with out shelling out cubic dollars for once. Any help will be gratefully received.

Cheers,

Shaun.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52928-boost-problems/
Share on other sites

how do you know its boost control that is making the power surge, Is the boost fluctuating up to 17psi?

if so at what revs, whats happening. need to know more than power is surging.

I would firstly test all the mencanical aspects of the boost control system first.

this being the actulators and waste gates. just run a hose from the plenum to the actulators with out anything T'd into it. this will give the lowest boost posible but there will be nothing to cause a surge with fluctuating boost levels.

if the power is on-off when run like that then its not the hks evc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/52928-boost-problems/#findComment-1040782
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...