Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by benm

Another dumb question...

Does anyone know/heard of a larger M-Spec S1 GTS-T rotors?

We have a stray Nissan Skyline front sample that is 310mm in diameter instead of the 296mm GTST.

This may be the missing link.

This has been a long haul sorting out these imports.:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5677-disc-rotors/page/8/#findComment-252001
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Steve,

My R34 chassis number is ER34 002415.

I've tried to find details in my R34 Service Manual but to no avail (only mentions nominal disc thickness 30mm and wear thickness 28mm).

My front brakes are of type OPZ25VC.

If you find out any info. please let me know. Hopefully there the same as R33 :-)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5677-disc-rotors/page/8/#findComment-252619
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Guest lpgb

Hello all,

I am new here but scanning through all the relevent posts...

i am planning a car for the 2005 Targa Tasmania......

My main question in the brake department is:

dbasteve wrote:"... DBA 963 you will get a 4963 which is our premium one piece GTP and Rally class rotor spec...."

Basically, is this the disk I should choose for the TT? and should they be matched out back?

the car is a GTS-t R33.

thanks,

Lachlan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5677-disc-rotors/page/8/#findComment-414796
Share on other sites

The 4000 series rotors will handle this quite well. Not only should you notice the difference/consistancy in braking but they will last longer too under high stress conditions.

The rear is available in 4000 series DBA 4908 to complete the setup.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5677-disc-rotors/page/8/#findComment-415047
Share on other sites

We only have 5000 series for GTR's at the moment. Dia 324mm x 30mm. There are plans to do a 16" wheel version in the future. Probably Jan/Feb 2004.

It is the same material spec as the 4000's. Just add one Aluminium hat.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/5677-disc-rotors/page/8/#findComment-415079
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty this is your red flag. In MAP based ECU's the Manifold pressure X RPM calculation is how the engine knows it is actually...running/going through ANY load. You are confusing the term 'base map' with your base VE/Fuel table. When most people say 'base map' they mean the stock entire tune shipped with the ECU, hopefully aimed at a specific car/setup to use as a base for beginning to tune your specific car. Haltech has a lot of documentation (or at least they used to, I expect it to be better now). Read it voraciously.
    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
×
×
  • Create New...