Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Sorry if it is a re-post,

20B 3-Rotor RX-8, 950Hp with a Garrett T76 dual ball bearing turbocharger on VP C16 race fuel.

20B 3-rotor

Acosta Racing ported and polished

Acosta Racing custom stainless steel turbo manifold

Acosta Racing intercooler

Acosta Racing downpipe

Acosta Racing fuel rails

Aluminum intercooler piping

Internal fuel pumps (2)

Magnaflow fuel regulator

Unorthodox Racing pulley

RPS Clutch

RPS Flywheel

3MM apex seals

Tial 46 mm Wastegate

Tial Blowoff valve

Microtech engine management

JIC coilovers

Carbon Fiber front strut tower bar

19” PIAA Superrozza (19x9 front, 19x10 rear)

Hankook Ventus (275-35/19 rear, 245-30/19 front)

Racing Brake rotors

MAZDASPEED front bumper cover custom modified with inlet

Carbon Fiber headlight eyelids

Spirt R badging

Custom upholstered seats and door inserts

pho_pro_18_1_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_2_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_3_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_4_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_5_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_6_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_7_lg.jpg

pho_pro_18_8_lg.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...