Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All! Ive just ordered a Tein Super Street kit for my 34 (if theyre no good its too late now anyways!! hehe) - has anyone used these before? I heard theyre ok for our roads cause they can be adjusted to be quite soft but also give a good feel on the hard setting?

also with adjustables is it a given that the lower you go with them the harder they should be set?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/62177-tein-super-street-comments/
Share on other sites

I got some for my r33 gtst last week and I havn't found the ride to hard at all, you definetely feel the bump more and have to slow down on bad road but not uncomfortable. The handling improvement from the standard gtst is like a different car and adjusting shocks makes a large difference for body role. As you lower the car you actually losen the springs, so they are actually softer for lower and harder when the car is higher.

They feel great to me, though I haven't had much to compare against. I have never used adjustable suspension before, but I found that it can make a huge difference on the track. Was understeering terribly on the track, a few turns of the damper and the understeer was almost gone.

The ride is actually better (not as hard) as my old stuffed shocks and lowered springs. So was a huge improvement everywhere in my R33.

Sydneykid: Pretty much all the information is available here:

http://www.tein.co.jp/ssdamp2ne.html

And just because I am nice, I worked out all the conversions (there may be an easier way!!). According to the booklet I received with the suspension they are 4kgf/mm front and rear.

From the references:

1kgf/mm = 9.80665N/mm

Therefore:

4kgf/mm = 39.22660N/mm

From the references:

1N/mm = 5.714 lbf/in

Therefore:

39.22660N/mm = 224.1407lbf/in

Therefore the answer is 224lb springs front and rear.

References:

http://wwwrsphysse.anu.edu.au/~amh110/Tech...e_conversio.htm

http://www.tomei-p.co.jp/_2003web-catalogu..._reference.html

PS: Thanks for all the excellent posts Sydneykid, when I see your posts I stop and read them from start to finish. ;)

I do it this way.....4kg/mm X 25.4 (mm's in an inch) X 2.2 (lbs in a kg) = 224 lbs per inch.

Which is OK for the front, but still too high for the rear. I would guess that they are still trying to compensate for the low rear anti roll by running a higher than necessary (to hold the car up) rear spring rate. A stabiliser bar upgrade is a technically superior solution. In the real world that means it won't compromise the ride comfort as much and allow much better (less wheelspin, more traction) launches.

:D

Well your way made a lot more sense! Glad I still came up the correct answer though :D

I really like this suspension, its hard but not too hard even for my 100km/h country roads. Compared to with my previous stuffed stocks with lowered springs its pure bliss, I don't have much else to compare too I'm afraid. :)

I had the front and rear set at 2 points (12 point adjustable from memory) from the softest setting. The rear was also set way too low (probably 30cm centre to guard). I found that in a straight line under acceleration you could feel the rear compress significantly and it was very difficult to get any wheel spin at all (i have allow subframe bushes too) - probably pretty good for the drags but not so great round the corners.

I've since changed the rear to about the 5th or 6th point (in the middle - probably too hard this time!) and the the front to the 4th setting. I've also adjusted the height according to the spec sheet ~ 33.5-34cm centre to guard front & rearl. Very much looking forward to testing this out at the next track day... once I've replaced the turbo :D

I'm looking at getting some upgraded front and rear sway/stabiliser bars from whiteline - would this be the next logical progression or would I be better off to get some more caster in the front?

From memory the spec sheet said 33.5cm centre wheel to guard. From the posts I've read (mostly Sydneykids!), the reccommendation is 34 - 35cm.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...center+to+guard

Also checkout these:

http://www.whiteline.com.au/articles/HPI_1..._Skyline01a.htm

http://www.whiteline.com.au/docs/Fact_Shee...line_R33GTS.PDF

Hope that helps :P

so they are actually softer for lower and harder when the car is higher.

Sorry Reedy, but I need to kill this quickly............

A 200 lbs per inch linear rate spring takes 200 lbs to move it one inch, or if you prefer....

A 3.5kg/mm spring takes 3.5 kgs to move it one mm.

It doesn't matter whether that is the first inch (mm) or the 10th inch (mm) it still takes 200 lbs (3.5kgs) to move it one inch (one mm).

The amount of preload is determined by the weight of the car. If that corner of the car weighs 400 lbs (182 kgs) then the spring will need to compress 2 inches (51mm) to hold it up. But it still takes 200 lbs (3.5kgs) to move it the next inch (25.4mm).

Progressive spring rates USUALLY compress all of the softer rate just in holding the car up. ie; they are progressive to make sure the spring doesn't go loose at full droop. They are not progessive to make the ride softer initially. This is not ALL progressive sapring just Most of them.

Hope that makes sense :P

I just received one of them!!!! (yay!) - gotta wait for the rest now.. :cheers:

Did any of you guys sets come pre-set with what at least Tein would say is the best settings for the car?? I was reading something on the internet and it sounded like it says they are already pre-set?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...