Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R33 Shell

I am selling my R33 GTST Series 1. Its a 1993 model which has been stripped for the motor and gearbox..

It is just a shell - no motor, box, clutch, shocks, wheels, brakes, or interior. Most panels are gone, except for the bootlid and the driver side. All glass is still in the car and is not damaged. All air conditioning parts remain apart from the center vents.

I am looking to get rif of this ASAP, so all serious offers will be considered. This car can be registered after repair as it is a repairable write off.

**CAR HAS A COMPLIANCE PLATE AND IS LISTED BY REVS AS A REPAIRABLE WRITE-OFF**

Photos will be posted very soon.

Price: $999.99 - all offeres considered. Pickup available from Silverwater NSW.

**MUST BE SOLD THIS WEEK - ALL OFFERS CONSIDERED!**

01.jpg

02.jpg

you say no shocks...what about other suspension components? eg control arms, swaybars etc

what colour is it?

is the shell damaged? what condition are the quarter panels in?

are both doors included? (this is implied by 'all glass')

any pics?

i am in vic but interested in this as a base for project car. can arrange tow truck. thanks.

I currently have an offer of $600 on the car.

all glass is still good, but the car sustained damage to the whole left hand side, front guard, front bumper, quarter panel, door, and rear bumper, and left rear light. Chasis rails are not bent, and this car will be registerable once repaired...

[/size]

All suspension will remain in the car excluding the shocks. Wheels will also be removed.

This is a great buy for anybody wanting to start a project 33. There is way more than $600 worth of parts sitting in the car (all aircon, instrument cluster, drivers side panels, glass, compliance plate, shell, suspension parts) is worth double the current offer of $600.

PM me for REVS check information details.

Pickup available from Silverwater this Saturday!

thanks for the reply. if you could be bothred taking a few pics showing the damage it would help me to decide if i want it, its hard to buy a wreck without seeing the extent of the damage first hand.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...