Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok,

So, if you really want your car to shoot a flame out (like a few feet) here is one way I've been told. I've also been told not to use it on the street, which I'll explain in a sec. I wouldn't do it myself.

As you are flooring the car getting ready for a shift, you set up your management to continue fueling as you push the clutch in (and back off for that second) as you go through the gears. It also retards the ignition which keeps the turbo on boost, and shooting raw feul out the back (which will catch fire if the exhaust is hot enough). Runs great, and heaps of fire (think v8 supercars). Cat, no cat, its doesn't matter, as long as you have a resonable sized pipe.

The downside is if you are driving down a hill, backed off, the car will still be feuling - which means the turbo will get HOT. Apparently even coasting down a hill for 30 secs or so can make a turbo glow red and fail.

Another system is to shoot a flamable gas (nos?) out the exhaust from near the diff, using a spark plug to ignite (ah lah Fast and Furious).

not that i'd bother...

That description doesn't just make a pop, its a rather big bang.

I don't think its harmful for a little pop every now and then, most skylines I know seem to have always done it....

You do not need to pump other gas into the pipe to create a flame, I've seen kits that work on a coil pack and a spark plug. They simply spark in the exhaust tip and bang, you have flame. Don't forget boys and girls, those gassesfumes are flamable!

http://www.flamethrowers.com.au

Rice anyone? Ooooh yar, 2F2F....

cars with a cat wont... some cars cats might be badly degraded (if its been on there for a few years etc) so you might get a flame.

Mine flames on the odd occasion... i think. Whether it makes it out the rear end or not i dunno. No-one's ever seen it.

You can tell the difference between a pop and a flame.

The sound is a tad different between the usual pop, and when the fuel catches.

not ture, i have a cat and i get flames (view the sauwa/silviawa cruise video) unless my abuses over the years has eaten it up

Pre-86 cars :(

In NSW (and ACT, which uses the NSW rules), an engine conversion on a car built from 1972 onwards has to meet the emmissions requirements of the year the engine was built in. Cars built prior to 1972 only have to meet the emmissions of when the car was built.

So - if you were to take a 1985 car and put an RB engine in it, you would have to run an exhaust choke... sorry, "catalytic convertor". I think it was the CEO of Lukey mufflers who commented that the best flowing catalytic convertors flowed almost as well as the worst flowing mufflers...

In my case, I can run aftermarket injection, play with cams, turbo etc. etc., and as long as I meet the CO/HC limits for 1971, I don't have to worry about the EPA.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'm looking for some real world experiences/feed back from anyone who has personally ran a EFR7670 with a 1.05 exhaust housing or a .83 I'm leaning towards the .83 because its a street car used mostly for spirited driving in the canyons roads. I"m not looking for big numbers on paper. I want a responsive powerband that will be very linear to 8000 rpm. I dont mind if power remains somewhat flat but dont want power to drop off on top. The turbo I've purchased is a 1.05, although the mounting flange T3 vs T4 and internal vs external waste gates are different on both housings, I not concern about swapping parts or making fabrication mods to get what I want. Based on some of the research I've done with chat gpt, the 1.05 housing seems to be the way to go with slightly more lag and future proofing for more mods but recommends .83 for best response/street car setup. AI doesn't have the same emotions as real people driving a GTR so I think you guys will be able to give me better feed back 😀   
    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
×
×
  • Create New...