Jump to content
SAU Community

  

281 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

I didnt think the G35 Skyline could bring down the skyline visuals any more but it looks like the current 2007 GTR is even worse... so ugly... nothing compliments the other.... Looks like they've thrown on a r33 GTR wing & just expected that shape to suite, Those rims are a gay spoke pattern & It almost looks like that car wants liposuction too... ahhh man... the r34 ZTune is truly the Last GTR.

032911-E.jpg

:spew:

http://www.edmunds.com/future/2007/infinit...33/photos.html#

LOL... that pic is a TEST MULE! It's about as far removed from the final product as you can get.

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

there is no way they would have the real thing out testing uncovered this far from realease anyway i bet the car looks nothing like that and rims are generally a detail thing totally different to what you see on test mules

Yeah I know its not final product, thats why I said "current 2007 GTR" meaning what’s visible to the publics eye currently... They're not looking good so far though... I have no doubts the end results will be nothing more than another tweaked 350Z, athough it might be good in it's own right, best just to call it a Z GTR.

Yeah I know its not final product, thats why I said "current 2007 GTR" meaning what’s visible to the publics eye currently...

So if it's not the final product, why are you criticizing it? Did you know that the 'test mule' for the V35 Skyline was actually a long-wheelbase R32 4-door? You can see it at the Nissan Prince Museum. So going along with your assumption, you could've said that the V35 looks sh!t because it's too much like an R32? lol

  • 2 weeks later...
So if it's not the final product, why are you criticizing it? Did you know that the 'test mule' for the V35 Skyline was actually a long-wheelbase R32 4-door? You can see it at the Nissan Prince Museum. So going along with your assumption, you could've said that the V35 looks sh!t because it's too much like an R32? lol

The characteristics of the test mule - i.e. aerodynamics do count though, you must admit.

the new skyline> its been around here for about 3.5 years now ????

ps: i didnt read one post in this thread so if ive missed something just ignore this post

しつれいしました

lol... yeah you're right Andrew but some of the replies were about the next GT-R so it's kinda 50/50.

I think they are a nice car in their own right - nice looking luxury saloon. but as for having the skyline moniker - they were always their own can, and were NEVER meant to be, or be interpreted as being a supersize version of a z car.... but they are now.

In my mind the 32-34's are the true iteration of a Skyline. 2 door COUPE. not liftback(or looking like one). But that's the way things go i guess... So long as they have the oven plate lights on the back of it, I'll still have a long hard look at it :-) I gotta say, that '07 gtr looks pretty damn hot! not to mention the engine and drivetrain specs! My dream car is still an r34 nur tho :)

OK :) 

Length

Width

Height

Grill

Grill placement

Headlights

Taillights

Bonnet

Bumpers

Doors

door handle placement

Bootlid V's Hatch

Other than mechanically tell me which parts interchange that you can see

Talk about splitting hairs. Ok, they're completely different, they resemble each other no more than the 300zx resembles an r32/r33/r34 skyline.

I take your point about following a design direction, but there's more to design than taking a beautiful car that was designed with correct proportions in mind, and clicking and dragging it out a bit, and whacking a few new trimmings on it. and as you said, they have an almost completely interchangeable drivetrain. yep, they're different alright!

  • 2 weeks later...
For those of us who care, we are bitterly disappointed that not only has the styling become homogenised, but the engine is the same, and the chassis is the same, and the engine is the same!  Rotating a door handle doesn't impress us, sorry.  Very disappointing for flagship models of a manufacturer.
WHAT!!! That's a skyline? I could have sworn that was an 350Z  
I take your point about following a design direction, but there's more to design than taking a beautiful car that was designed with correct proportions in mind, and clicking and dragging it out a bit, and whacking a few new trimmings on it. and as you said, they have an almost completely interchangeable drivetrain. yep, they're different alright!

Err you guys do realize that the V35 was designed and released before the 350Z don't you???

After reading some of your other posts in here, especially from geno8r and slow13dude I would guess not. If you don't like the design then fine, but stop spreading a lot of BS about the V35 being a copy of the 350Z when it is the other way round.

After reading some of your other posts in here, especially from geno8r and slow13dude I would guess not. If you don't like the design then fine, but stop spreading a lot of BS about the V35 being a copy of the 350Z when it is the other way round.

I like the design of the 350Z... but the new skyline is basically a 350Z... i dont care which was designed first, the fact is they're both very similar cars... with different names.

Nissan has gone down the Path of car manufactures like Holden, Ford, & now Mazda. Most of the cars produced by these manufactures all look very similar... The GTO all the way down to the Commonwhore... they still 'basically' look the same. Just tweaks here & there. Mazda's 6, 3, & 2 all look very similar.... I spose its also like BMW... Theres a heap of different beamers out there & if you dont know beamers well you could almost swear they're all the same car, only the badge at the back lets you know its actually a different model. I spose my viewpoint is simply it seems kinda lame to badge a new car a with a new name as if it's a totally new car when its not really.. It's a tweak of an existing model, & Nissan never used to be like where they’re heading today. I mean Nissan produced totally different performances cars back in the days like the Silvia, 300ZX, & the Skyline. Now Nissan has the Maxima, V35, & 350Z all looking the same. I think a V35 done up does look mad, I just don’t think it should be called a skyline, visually it’s brought nothing over from the previous skyline & even the engine has now gone NA where there used to be a popular line turbo skylines with Twin Turbos or Singles & also NA’s. At least the next GTR will be TT.

Err you guys do realize that the V35 was designed and released before the 350Z don't you???

After reading some of your other posts in here, especially from geno8r and slow13dude I would guess not. If you don't like the design then fine, but stop spreading a lot of BS about the V35 being a copy of the 350Z when it is the other way round.

That's the best you can do? That we got which copied off which wrong?

Same styling, same engine, same chassis, it doesn't matter which came first.

:confused:

yep sure is one ugly car :rofl:

Correct. :uh-huh:

i really liked the styling of R34 and when i first saw the r35 concept i was thinking that nissan have taken a turn for the worst (especially after they ditched the GT-R name). but as more models were released my opinion changed from "awful" to "just ohk"

i think they went soft on the styling, opting for a luxurious, european look

i much preferred the agressive, angry, sports car look of the r34

  • 2 weeks later...
I like the coupe.

2005 version pushing out 295 HP stock and the previous versions doing 280 HP stock with low 14 second 1/4's stock I mean whats not to like.

Plus with some decent rims they uber nice.

I'll tell you what's not to like, it looks like garbage and doesn't have the previous aggression and street cred that all the previous GTR's claimed. I think the modell should be recalled and all of them destroyed, let a straight person design it next time.

Err you guys do realize that the V35 was designed and released before the 350Z don't you???

Actually, the V35 sedan was designed and released before the Fairlady Z (350Z) beack in 2001, but the V35 Coupe (the which people are confusing with the 350Z) was released after the 350Z in 2003. So in actual fact, you *could* say that the V35 Skyline Coupe is copying the 350Z...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Surely somebody has one in VIC. Have you asked at any shops?  Is this the yearly inspection or did you get a canary?
    • This is where I share pain with you, @Duncan. The move to change so many cooling system pieces to plastic is a killer! Plastic end tanks and a few plastic hose flanges on my car's fail after so little time.  Curious about the need for a bigger rad, is that just for long sessions in the summer or because the car generally needs more cooling?
    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
×
×
  • Create New...