Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My dad has recently started up his own small business called "Datadot Home and Business" . As some of you may already know, datadots are also used to coat the majority of parts in a lot of the new vehicles such as the FPV range and also the HSV range (lift up the bonnet and it has the identification plate there in front of you) to prevent them from being stolen, taken to pieces and then the parts sold individually. Basically the way they work is that the vin number of the vehicle is edged into these dots which are about the same size as the eye in this smily - :) .

When applied they are stuck down with a clear, heat resistant glue (which is basically impossible to remove) which also contains a UV trace. When placed under a microscope it reveals the vin number of the vehicle. At the moment my dads business has moved and focused in on the building industry targeting big firms such as "MTA" and "Multiplex". These businesses have a tremendous amount of theft from building sites, with the theft of things such as hot water systems etc. In a recent test one of the local home building companies took upon a trial period of marking datadots on some of there sites. At the end of the trial period a survey was shown that theft had dramatically dropped in the marked sites and had actually risen in the unmarked building sites, shown that marking property actually detered thieves.

A police bust was carried out a couple of months ago where they raided a warehouse full of stolen goods. But because none of the property could be identified, nothing could be returned to there rightful owners. After working closely with cash convertors (an easy offload for thieves) it is now manditory to run a UV light over all property being sold.

Anyway moving along, I have been wondering for a while whether this sort of technology would work well on marking property in vehicles. With the ability to mark things such as rims, decks, spoilers, turbos, intercoolers etc. etc. without the hassle and destructive effect that engraving does to property it may be a good idea to protect against and deter thieves in a similar and additional way an alarm system works. At a relatively low price for the starting kits at $99 which has 1000 dots included, gives almost enough dots to completely cover most items in a car. With the choice of having your choice of identification edged in the dots (normally just a drivers license number) it seems like a pretty cool idea.

Just wondering what other peoples thoughts would be on this matter.

Btw this is in no way beneficial to myself, I've just heard so many stories of people having things stolen on this forum and I'm just out try and give people a edge in the fight against crime and to see what other people think

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/67324-property-identification/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
    • Well the install is officially done. Filled with fluid and bled it today, but didn't get a chance to take it on a test drive. I'll throw some final pics of the lines and whatnot but you can definitely install a DMAX rack in an R33 with pretty minor mods. I think the only other thing I had to do that isn't documented here is grind a bit of the larger banjo fitting to get it to clear since the banjos are grouped much tighter on the DMAX rack. Also the dust boots from a R33 do not fit either fyi, so if you end up doing this install for whatever reason you'll need to grab those too. One caveat with buying the S15 dust boots however is that the clamps are too small to fit on the R33 inner tie rod since they're much thicker so keep the old clamps around. The boots also twist a bit when adjusting toe but it's not a big deal. No issues or leaks so far, steering feels good and it looks like there's a bit more lock now than I had before. Getting an alignment on Saturday so I'll see how it feels then but seems like it'll be good to go       
×
×
  • Create New...