Jump to content
SAU Community

500HP Turbo Kit for RB20/RB25DET

boosted_32
 Share

Recommended Posts

boosted_32 Proficient

boosted_32

Posted
Posted

BRAND NEW TURBO KIT FOR RB20/RB25DET

SPECS:


· T3/T4 .50compressor housing, .63 exhaust housing, 5 Bolt exhaust.

· (1) 90-degree and (1) 45-degree pipe for Downpipe

· Brand new 8.7Psi Wastegate

· Brand New Dual Type 50mm BOV

· Set of Turbo accessories

· One full set Oil Line and fittings

· Oil return Line kit

. Stainless (High mount) Manifold - STAINLESS with Lifetime Warranty

Price is $1500 + delivery.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/68763-500hp-turbo-kit-for-rb20rb25det/
Share on other sites
boosted_32 Proficient

boosted_32

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The AR's for this turbo are very common for upgrades to the R32 and R33 you will obviously find your car Cumming on to boost a bit later as it is a bigger turbo you might be sacrificing any where from 300 to 500rpm to what your stock turbo would come on to boost it can handle up to 20psi as well.

Thanks

boosted_32 Proficient

boosted_32

Posted
  • Author
Posted
What kinda lag wud u get with that on an rb20 and what boost levels are best through it?

The AR's for this turbo are very common for upgrades to the R32 and R33 you will obviously find your car Cumming on to boost a bit later as it is a bigger turbo you might be sacrificing any where from 300 to 500rpm to what your stock turbo would come on to boost it can handle up to 20psi as well.

Thanks

boosted_32 Proficient

boosted_32

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I know plenty of people using Master Power turbos and making big reliable power.

very similiar to XSPower....

Its the way you install the turbo, most people that buy these turbos are on a budget therefor they usually try and install the turbo themselves and theres your problem right there, there is alot of people out there that dont know the 1st thing about installing a turbo and are on a budget and try and install themselves to save a bit of $$$, they just think they can rip the old one off and slap the new one on.

LBR33 Grand Master

LBR33

Posted
Posted
Its the way you install the turbo, most people that buy these turbos are on a budget therefor they usually try and install the turbo themselves and theres your problem right there, there is alot of people out there that dont know the 1st thing about installing a turbo and are on a budget and try and install themselves to save a bit of $$$, they just think they can rip the old one off and slap the new one on.

Most turbos that die are due to poor quality turbos like XSPower

http://www.mx6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=110947

]

The Ebay seller you bought it off

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAP...sspagename=WDVW

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • CF.Panda
      R34 25GT Engine Light 21

      By CF.Panda · Posted

      AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • Haggerty
      RB25DE NEO with Haltech ECU

      By Haggerty · Posted

      As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • AnimalGarage
      spot the stagea

      By AnimalGarage · Posted

      It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...