Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^^^^ I'm with not so stupid.

SAFC only does fuel maps (so to speak)

I belive the Chip allows for timing changes as well.

Speak to TOSHI from these forums.

Many people have used him with great results.

Very good pricing too.

PS: 16psi on rb25 turbo hey...

Starts taking bets on how long till it go kaBLAAAMOOO

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1287553
Share on other sites

trevvy: please forgive me for hijacking but u just posted what i was goin to post...

can anyone give any insight on a unichip compared to a safc II? both can be had at the same price (roughly). safc can only do fuel whilst unichip can do fuel and timing.. are they worth it ... i want roughly a 15+ kw gain ..

edit: i heard toshi also does a remap/daughterboard for r34? anyone have any experiences? i'm interested as i want to get it tuned by the top secret guy coming to australia mid May

reason why i'm not goin powerfc is due to my car being a tiptronic

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1287555
Share on other sites

apparently u can run more boost thru the rb25 turbo on the rb20 because it isnt flowing as much air to create the same boost, big thread on it i will find it tonite

thanx for the prompt replies

Trev

I still wouldn't push it past 1 bar.

1bar on the track would be pushing it though.

I know of a R32 RB25 turbo pushing 14psi that made 190rwkw. :cheers:

Chipped ecu, Blitz SBC-iD EBC, Pod, FMIC, 3" Exhaust.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1288743
Share on other sites

For a street car, go with the chip.

There is not much that cant be altered.

eg.

LEVEL 1: speed cut change/eliminate, rev limit change, boost cut change/eliminate.

LEVEL 2: fuel map adjustment, ignition map adjustment.

LEVEL 3: rpm scale adjustment, load scale adjustment (for higher boost levels).

LEVEL 4: injector size re-scaling, AFM re-sizing.

Its all do-able, if you can fit an eprom!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1292194
Share on other sites

Yes, the injector latency (sometimes called void blast off time) can be adjusted.

This is part of the issue with the 550cc RX7 injectors, the other is they may not be exactly 550cc/min. Hence, the injector setup parameter may need to be further tweeked for 'best fit'. It may take a few trys but do-able.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1293448
Share on other sites

Can the SAFC2 do the following:  

1. speed cut change/eliminate

2. rev limit change

3. boost cut change/eliminate.

4. And is it possible to have both the chip and safc2 on board?

Suggestions follow;

1. No

2. No

3. No such thing as "boost cut", there is protection from excessive airflow. AFM voltage benders such as SAFC, DFA. EManage etc can be tuned to lower the AFM voltage signal to the ECU. Hence it doesn't know about the excessive airflow.

4. Yes.

Hope that was of some help:cheers:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1305350
Share on other sites

It feels like basically you guy's are saying the SAFC2 is useless, What kinda gains can be had with one does any one hare have some real experiance with them?

What gains/losses have been seen. Cause lets face it they are a much cheaper alternative to aftermarket EM.

( I know that aftermarket EM offers alot more control and tunability but 1500 to 2000 for supply fit and tune, Compared with 500ish you can see why there would be a market for it, ( If there are gains to be had.))

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1305448
Share on other sites

It feels like basically you guy's are saying the SAFC2 is useless, What kinda gains can be had with one does any one hare have some real experiance with them?

I have an SAFC2 in my car (series 1 R33) i got my timing and the SAFC2 tuned and only 1 psi boost increase resulted in 36KW at the wheels increase. But to get the SAFC2 running properly without fuel cutting they had to install a FCD.

Take a look at my dyno graph. Note the dyno graph is just to show the increase its not what my car is actually making at the moment. Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69595-chip-or-safc/#findComment-1305999
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...