Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a 1989 nissan cefiro GTS-R (a31) with a RB24S carburated type engine,

i was wondering how much HP this engine has?

im not sure if i could compare it to the rb20 engine as it has a 2 litre block and

mine's 2.4L., rather it looks very much the same as the rb20. ive searched the internet

but not much info about this...maybe you guys can help...thanks :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70524-rb24s/
Share on other sites

These engines are good "if" you have an rb20 and want to make a hybrid.

you use the rb24 block, crank and rods as these give a longer stroke than the rb20. and you use the head, pistons, and intake, exhaust manifolds from the rb20.

This Gives you a RB24DET. these are very revvy engines and produce better torque than the rb20 because of the stroke. also having a bigger capacity helps a lot too.

You need bigger cams if you want to make any decent power out of em'

(more than 220rwkw)

just buy an rb20 motor loom and computer and build a RB24DET. you will have something a little different too :cheers:

they also have some small advantages over the rb25.

1. rb20 heads dont blow ringlands anywhere as often

2. rb20 upgrade injectors are easier to come by than side feed

3. it looks standard and will be impossible to tell once built!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70524-rb24s/#findComment-1304193
Share on other sites

thanks guys...

im kinda new with this car coz actually i just purchased this car over a week ago, Sold my mitsubishi lancer for it :D...

the only difference i think is that its got a longer stroke than a rb20e, and that its carburated...(hehehe), compared with what most of u guys have i'd say this engine's sux...

since i dnt have the money for an engine swap yet...i think id go for the basic intake~exhaust~headers upgrade first...

by the way guys your website's the best!! more power to you!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/70524-rb24s/#findComment-1306753
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • A super responsive 250 would be nice in a daily.
    • My son saw this Porsche 904 in Yodoyabashi in Osaka, not sure if it's the plastic or fibreglass version 767605763.559358.mp4
    • I agree re not trusting it as it makes mistakes however can do hours of research for you at times by simply asking a question
    • The I've done a lot of research and feel like I'm becoming a nut and washer expert. The washer in question doesn’t look very conical—it’s almost flat, but one side has a chamfer. The guide's picture shows the convex side (chamfered side) facing the nut, but the text says the chamfer should face the pulley, which is confusing. If I follow the picture, the chamfer faces the nut, but the instructions say the opposite. When I place the washer on a flat surface, one side looks flatter—maybe that's the concave side—so I would expect the chamfer to be on that side. But it isn’t, which adds to the confusion. The term chamfer is also throwing me off. I always thought the concave side should face the pulley, and the convex side (with the chamfer) should face the nut or bolt head. But Nissan’s instructions say the chamfer should face the pulley, which seems backward. I know I’m probably overthinking it, but I want to be sure I’m doing it right. Also, I’ve seen some people replace the nut and stud with a bolt, but I assume that’s not a good idea, since it might not keep proper tension on the tensioner. Lastly, just to be 100% sure: the pressure washer should face the pulley, then the conical washer? That feels strange, since usually the pressure washer goes first, facing the bolt or nut.
×
×
  • Create New...