Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

For a reliable street setup:

1. For the argument sake, if you could get a RB26 head at the same price as the R32 RB25de head which one would you use and why?

2. What compression ratio would you aim for and (if not stock) what pistons and head gasket would you use to achive that?

3. What would be a reasonable power target?

:D

Suggestions follow;

1. The RB26 is vastly superior, it has solid followers, better valve springs, cheaper and easier to get cams, no VVT, best inlet manifold design, multiple throttle butterflies, better water jacket design, better valves, higher oil flow return to the sump ........ I think you get the idea.

2. Compression ratio is 9 to 1. We use JE pistons and standard Nissan head gasket. Obviously the block is O'ringed and we use ARP head studs.

3. With good rods we are up to 950 bhp (that's using an annealed copper head gasket though).

Hope that helps:cheers:

Thanks SK! do you thinkif we use the 2835's a 7500rpm limiter will be high enough?

also do you have any idea when boost may come on with say 270 deg pro cams.

of coarse it will have all the other stuff done such as porting and oil pump, all the usual build up parts.

Thanks SK! do you thinkif we use the 2835's a 7500rpm limiter will be high enough?

also do you have any idea when boost may come on with say 270 deg pro cams.

of coarse it will have all the other stuff done such as porting and oil pump, all the usual build up parts.

We have never used 2835's on an RB30, far too big for our applications. The numbers say 9,000 rpm on an RB26 is equivalent in airflow to 7,500 on an RB31. So they should be fine.

My own RB31 uses 272/280 Jun 10.8 mm lift cams for circuit racing, the 3.1 litres lets you run pretty bag cams that would kill a 2.5/2.6 litre.

:P

Thanks! the whole topic of which one was started as the Neo has VVT and some other mumbo i'm not to sure about.

Sk to keep costs done could a use s stock GTR head with stock valve train execept for a set of drop in pon cams with the new RB 30 bottom end and have the rev limiter set at 7500,would that be ok for 400RWKW? with good reliability?

just as we want to get the car running first, and then we can build a big head for it later.

i was also thinking that since he wants to use the car for club racing, it maybe better that he uses our GT-ss turbos to make an easy 350WRKW with the 7500rpm rev limiter.

do you thinkthis set up would work or would it suffer to much up top?

Cheers Ben

With the exact same setup on the 3ltr as the 2.6ltr the 3ltr will ALWAYS make the peak power earlier. IF it has maxed out the airflow for a given boost level.

What I'm saying is if you want it to make peak power around 7000rpm then setup the motor (cams and exhaust turbine a/r) as if it were an RB26 reving to and making its peak power around 8100rpm. For an RB26 to make peak power up around 8100rpm you will require larger than stock cams, and may need larger exhaust a/r's etc.

Thanks! the whole topic of which one was started as the Neo has VVT and some other mumbo i'm not to sure about.

Sk to keep costs done could a use s stock GTR head with stock valve train execept for a set of drop in pon cams with the new RB 30 bottom end and have the rev limiter set at 7500,would that be ok for 400RWKW? with good reliability?

just as we want to get the car running first, and then we can build a big head for it later.

i was also thinking that since he wants to use the car for club racing, it maybe better that he uses our GT-ss turbos to make an easy 350WRKW with the 7500rpm rev limiter.

do you thinkthis set up would work or would it suffer to much up top?

Cheers Ben

Hi Ben, using a stock GTR head with Poncams would be fine, it just waists money as you have to dissassemble it again to fit the good top end. I believe the cost of duplicated labour plus parts like gaskets and seals, would outway the cost of doing it right the first time. Do the numbers and I am sure you will come to the same conclusion.

GTSS's are a bit small, I even disgarded the idea of using the larger 2530's on my own RB31. I reckon GTRS's would be the go, if you want twins. Mine has a big single as I wanted the lower weight, better weight distribution and less complexity.

:P

What size would you recomend for a good club racing style turbo.HKS 3240?

Any ball bearing turbo that supplies 60 lbs of air per minute at around 1.5 bar (or less) would be my choice. I chose a Turbonetics T66 with dual ceramic ball bearings and a titanium compressor.:)

hey, just wondering what sort of budget would be required to build an engine with the rb26 head and rb30 bottom end making a reliable and responsive power output of around 300rwkw. Also, what would need to be changed to do this? (eg, cams, turbo's, pistons etc)

thanks :)

modr33s2,

5k is around the mark with a set of forgy's.

Thats not touching the head, no port work etc. Just bolting it on.

Its also obviously not including labour to drop the motor in.

Yeah he did alot of the work himself melted 3 motors with the nos, was also sponsored by mod shop but work on motor was done by someone with expertise in that area.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
    • If they can dyno them, get them dyno'd, make sure they're not leaking, and if they look okay on the dyno and are performing relatively well, put them in the car.   If they're leaking oil etc, and you feel so inclined, open them up yourself and see what you can do to fix it. The main thing you're trying to do is replace the parts that perish, like seals. You're not attempting to change the valving. You might even be able to find somewhere that has the Tein parts/rebuild kit if you dig hard.
×
×
  • Create New...