Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know when the ECU in skylines (specifically RB25DET) run in Closed loop lambda control mode, ie; adjusting the air fuel ratios based on O2 sensor readings. I have heard it only runs closed loof on cruise (after sufficient time at constant RPM), but I have also heard they run closed most of the time, only going into open loop on full throtle.

Thanks in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/73982-closed-loop-lambda-control/
Share on other sites

The tuning on the factory ecu has the car in closed loop with anything below atmospheric pressure in the manifold.

i.e, it doesnt go out of closed loop and into open loop until you hit 0 vacuum or any positive pressure above that.

The only reason it would not be in closed loop under those conditions is if the sensor was stuffed or the engine had just been started. (It takes a few minuted for the O2 sensor to warm up)

They are pretty good, the design of the combustion chamber with good squish zones allow them to run closed loop/stoich ratios even under low manifold pressure. Alot of older cars will go into open loop when the manifold is still under vacuum.

I hope that all makes sense.

Taking note of the PFC I find the O2 sensor is in closed loop under light acceleration and cruise. It reacts very quickly, if you are within a closed loop enabled load point then you will be in closed loop.

The o2 sensor is disabled when you hit certian load points, nothing to do with manifold pressure/vac.

You should make those load points closed loop enabled as well.

If the factory ecu can run with stoich mixtures anything under 0 manifold vacuum the powerfc should as well.

Or alternatively, disable closed loop altogether and tune light load to leaner then stoich to pick up even more economy where possible.

SAFC is usually only used to lean out the open loop high load/boost areas. This is where you make your power gains, especially with the Nissan ECU's that run way rich under load.

If you change the AFM voltage in closed loop with the SAFC, the ecu will re-adjust the mixtures to 14.7:1. However the timing would have still changed because you changed the AFM voltage to the ecu with the SAFC.

I'm suprised they stay in closed loop that much. I'm getting about 12-13L/100km from a manual R33, maybe I should change the 02 sensor out of routined maintenance.

If it is running 14.7 most of the time I would think fuel consumption wouldn't be that bad. I guess it's got a lot to do with how often you put uyour foot into it also.

  • 1 month later...

I had my car run up on the dyno to check whether the O2 sensors were working on my GTR. I was interested in knowing when it was in closed loop, as that's where the best fuel economy should be.

Apparently the standard R32 GTR is in closed loop until around 3000 rpm if it is under light load (< 30% ?). Mine stays in closed loop until 4200 even under full load. His guess was that at 4200 rpm, my 80mm AFMs were putting out the same voltage as the standard AFMs did at around 3000 rpm.

The result is that I'm still in closed loop when I'm on 4 lb boost.

Does his suggestion sound reasonable?

Apparently its optimal to have the car run in closed loop up until around 30rwkw.

I think the PFC uses the fuel map to determine when to bump out of closed loop mode. Once the fuel map value goes over 1.047 or something. It may also have a little to do with the throttle position sensor.

I really have no idea, possibly its a little of both.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... a good amount of people (not all) on that continent seem to know everything and like to measure things in bananas, football fields, statue of liberties instead of the metric system lol.
    • I assume the modules are similar enough, so if you've had no issues I don't see why I would. I have tried to find a wiring diagram for the FPCM / fuel pump circuit, but I can't find it anywhere. Otherwise, I would just do some wire cutting and joining at the FPCM and give the 12 V supplied to the FPCM directly to the pump instead. If you know anyone that could help with wiring diagrams, I'd be very happy  
    • If it dies, then bypass. The task isn't difficult. I have one running on a standard R32 FPCM. That's after nearly 20 years of it running an 040, which pull substantially more current than the Walbro. They're not the same module, but I'd hope it indicates that the R33 one should be man enough for the job. I think people kill them when putting proper sized pumps on them, not these little toy pumps we're talking about here.
    • Silicone spray won't hurt anything. And if it does, that's an opportunity to put some solid steel spherical bushings in, so you can really learn what suspension noise sounds like, If you're going to try it, just spray one bush at a time, so you can work out which one is actually noisy. My best guess is that if the noise started only since putting the coilovers in, then it is just noise being transmitted up through the top mounts of the struts, and not necessarily "new" noise from bushes. But it's almost impossible to know.
    • Are you saying the 34 is SUV height, and not that we're talking about an SUV here? (because if we're talking about an SUV, you don't fix them. You just replace them when something breaks. Not worth establishing sufficient emotional connection with an SUV to warrant doing any work on one). I wouldn't jack my car up on a short little loop of 10mm steel rod poking out through a hole in the bumper bar, front or rear end. I realise that we're probably not talking about that type of loop at the front, being the one under/behind the bar on a Skyline.... but even for that one, trying to jack up on what amounts to a thin piece of steel, designed purely for withstanding a horizontal tension force, not a vertical compressive force (and so would be prone to buckling/crushing) and, my most particular bitch about it - located RIGHT AT THE EXTREME FRONT OF THE CAR, applying a load up through the radiator support panel, etc, with almost the entire mass of the car cantilevered between there and the rear wheels? Nope. Not doing that. Not on the regular. That structure out there in front of the front crossmember is not designed to carry load in the vertical direction. Not really designed to carry any load at all, really. The chassis rail that the tow point is connected to would be fine loaded in tension, as per towing. Not intended to carry the mass of the whole car, especially loaded all on one rail, with twisting and all sorts of shitty load distribution going on. No, I will happily drive up on some pieces of wood, thanks. That can only happen on driven wheels, and they are at the other end of the car, and this problem does not exist at that end of the car. And even then, I have been known to drive up on at least 1x piece of 2x8 each side at the rear, simply to reduce the amount of jack pumping necessary to get the car up high enough for the jack stands. What really really shits me about Skylines is the lack of decent places for chassis stands at either end of the car. You'd think they'd be designed into the crossmembers.
×
×
  • Create New...