Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok ppls.

Here I have a RB20DET Wastegate actuator that holds boost to 11psi.

I also have a VG30BB Wastegate actuator that holds boost to around 6-7psi.

I have an EBC.

Would it be true to assume that the EBC will have better faster control over the lighter wastegate actuator?

Hence you will be able to possibly run a higher gain as the wastegate will act quicker?

What are your views ppls.

I'm going to slap it on and will post my results within the next few days.

nope.. They wouldn't refund.

They replaced it with another VG30 Turbo, it was either that or a credit note which I wasn't to happy about.

I've put this one on and standard boost (11psi) I can hear a slight screach that is really quiet. As soon as I set it for 12psi I get a really loud screaching noise.

It seems to almost go away a little if I flatten it.

If it turns out this one is stuffed, the next turbo I'm going to see if they will pay for it to get checked out before I put it on as this next turbo will be the third turbo.

Be buggered if i'm going to take the VG30 off again then put the RB20 back on AGAIN then swap the VG30 AGAIN then pull the rb20 off AGAIN then put the new vg on again. argg :) Oh well.

I feel that with this trouble I should be entitled to a refund.

What can I say.. I was told to steer clear of the VG30BB Turbo's.

I did a search and some one else has had the problem with their VG30BB starting to screach.

Originally posted by -Joel-

Ok ppls.

Here I have a RB20DET Wastegate actuator that holds boost to 11psi.

I also have a VG30BB Wastegate actuator that holds boost to around 6-7psi.

I have an EBC.

Would it be true to assume that the EBC will have better faster control over the lighter wastegate actuator?

Hence you will be able to possibly run a higher gain as the wastegate will act quicker?

What are your views ppls.

I'm going to slap it on and will post my results within the next few days.

Just wondering what kinda boost you'll be running at the minimum?

I don't think a EBC can make the 11psi actuator open any earlier than 11 psi.

So if you're gonna run 8psi daily and on occasion go to 13psi (for example) then go the VG30BB one.

I stand to be corrected however, but I always thought EBC's can't open wastegates at lower boost levels than what the actuator is set at.

Thats right they can't but you get something that is called wastegate creep.

Say the wastegate actuator holds boost at 10psi.

At 5psi the wastegate is going to start opening which slows the boost spool

This is why EBC's are good as they stop the wastegate opening until the very last second that is possible as not to spike.

With a 10psi wastegate actuator it requires 10psi to open fully and at 5psi it is say half open.

So what I was getting at is a heavy spring(10psi) will cause the wastegate to be slower reacting where as a light spring will be quicker at reacting.

So if we set boost to 13psi. With a 10psi actuator we may have to start opening the wastegate with the EBC at around 10psi for the boost not to spike over the 13psi limit.

With a 6-7psi actuator we may be able keep the wastegate shut until around 11psi due to it opening quicker and easier with less boost.

Its probably doesn't make jack difference by the seat of the pants but IT MAY make a difference with a slow spooling turbo i.e my vg30bb turbo that makes 3psi by 2000rpm then 6psi by 3000rpm then by around 3800rpm it makes 12psi.

This may help increase the spool rate if in a gear that is to high and or going up a hill.

Just an Idea...

Anyway this dud vg30BB turbo that I have makes strange noises when boosting to 12psi and JMS have agreed to refund my money.

I'm not going to waste my time with another VG30BB turbo as I have heard and when done a search on a few forums found that others also have had problems with the BB variant of the VG30 Turbo.

I may look at highflowing the standard turbo which is around $1000. At least then I know it will be reliable.

I just need to get hold of a couple of specs that makes the RB20DET Turbo make decent power without to much lag.

Or I may get Tim who used to own RPM to get me a GT25 330hp turbo for $1500 make an adaptor plate and mod the dump.

DEpends.. WOuld the 330hp GT25 make around 200rwkw?? I'm thinking that maybe stretching its limits a little.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...