Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As there is a list of states in the Forum index

New South Wales

Victoria

Western Australia

Queensland

Nothern Territory

South Australia

Australia Capital Territory

Tasmania

Then under each of those states, there is currently a sub-forum called 'Events'.

Another suggested Sub-Forum that could be added is - Your Skyline Project

This allowing each member from each state to post the details of their car in this sub-forum and detailing what they are doing to their skyline as they go along with upgrading bits and pieces of it.

e.g. -

Their first post would be a complete description/specification list of what is currently in their skyline.

Then the second post would be "I've now upgraded my turbo from the old one to this new one, blahh blahh blahh"

and they can just keep adding to the list.

As well as progressing with upgrading their thread, they can also add pics incase their body kits change or interior changes, etc etc.

This, however is just an idea to get more people into posting more details about their skylines on here.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89065-new-sub-forum-suggestion/
Share on other sites

each state's layout is controlled by the individual state club, so the structure of the WA section has a for sale subsection for perthies only, and the VIC section has a downloads section for our newsletters and publications etc. If you want to add a buildup subsection in the states you have to lobby all the state clubs to implement it, its not something we (admins) would want to just impose on all the states.

Ahh, sounds fair then. It was just a suggestion that I thought I would put forward as it would then allow people to become a bit more interactive with the site as keeping their skyline profile up to date is somewhat a enjoyable thing to some.

After all, on boostcruising, people are constantly posting new pics of their cars after they wash them

:P

lol yeah true, would be good to see what everyone's up to, which is why the SAU member blog was implemented, but on a forum wide scale instead of state by state. Hopefully its able to be put to good use by the members, and we can develop it better.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...