Jump to content
SAU Community

Calling All Ecutek Owners + New Comers


Recommended Posts

Hello,

I'm a UK tuner over in Melbourne currently, it's been drawn to my attention through various people that EcuTEK doesn't have a great name over here and having done some reading online it's my opinion that a large portion of the issues come from the tuners and also the way that EcuTEK is sold over here. I've personally tuned using EcuTEK, Cobb and Syvecs for one of the UK's leading GTR specialists and feel that EcuTEK is un-fairly handled over here.

So what you ask..

I'll check your tune for FREE.

You will likely know that I cannot work with your existing tune but I can assess your datalogs. I won't throw a load of technical words at you but will show you on the data where you tune could be better. Now if you're Melbourne based I can do this in person, if you're further afield and have an EcuTEK lead then I'm happy to look at your datalogs via email. For this to be FREE all I need from you is to see an invoice/receipt saying that you've paid for an EcuTEK tune from a EcuTEK tuner/agent.

For clarity, I also tune using Cobb and there's one statement that I feel needs to be made clearly.

Cobb/EcuTEK can BOTH make a safe, enjoyable, powerful map - it's all down to the tuner.

Anyone who tells you different has a vested interest in one way or the other.

In my opinion, I prefer EcuTEK as a platform - particularly for cars that are pushing past the boundaries of the stock MAFs where you can utilise the hybrid-speed density to utilise the MAF for cruise/drivability and SD for higher loads. I like that Cobb has access to fault codes etc, but if your car is tuned right you'll never need to access them :cool:

There are other points, but this isn't about selling EcuTEK - more about using my time in Australia wisely :) I'm here until late April...

Any comments are welcome, but make them factual based on YOUR experience with EcuTEK

Feel free to contact me on here or via my new for 2016 Facebook profile HERE

Daniel
Tuned by DAN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

The R35 GTR owners dont use this forum much Dan, if i knew i would get you over to Sydney instead - more of us run Ecutek here than in Melbourne but you will find the majority run Cobb as that is what most local tuners are comfy with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. Any decent third party diagnostics unit should be able to talk Consult and all the other non-OBD protocols from back in the day. It's only 25 years since OBD started taking over. There's many cars from that ear still on the road. My mechanic's diag terminal is plenty able to talk to the other CUs in my car. Well, those that are still present, anyway. That's probably only the HICAS CU, as there never was an ABS or TCS or SRS CU, and the TCU went in the bin 25 years ago.
    • You'd be better off putting the ATTESA stuff into the boot. Same same but different, and not as bulky as a fuel cell. The space under the parcel shelf is not what I'd call "useful" boot space most of the time, even if I seem to have a guitar (not mine - child's) sitting there most days lately.
    • The main argument for lighter ARBs is that ARBs reduce the independence of the suspension. They link the left wheel to the right wheel. The lighter the ARB is, the less this linkage. When you hit a significant one wheel bump on a car with lighter springs and heavier ARBs, more of that disturbance gets transferred across to the other wheel. Whereas, with a heavier spring and lighter ARB, the impacted wheel is the only one that reacts to the hit. If you hit a significant two wheel bump, then lighter springs are the only things taking the bump as the ARB is not involved (both ends move up/down together). Then the spring rates alone determine how the car takes the hit. Softer springs (to a degree) will be more comfortable. Harder springs will accept the energy input better with less total compression (but obviously possibly more undesirable and probably uncomfortable body movement). The other significant thing to remember is that spring rate is really about coping with the rate at which loads are input to the suspension. Driving around slowly? Then any bump you hit is going to feed load into the suspension at a low rate, and you can use a low rate spring and with a low rate spring the damper has to less work to control the spring's motion. This describes street usage because it is mostly illegal to go fast or drive aggressively enough to require handling fast load inputs. But if you're going at racetrack speeds (or rally, or anything where going fast over whatever the surface is) then the loads get applied faster and you need to control that input with more spring rate, and then the dampers have to do more and that's why it all starts getting expensive. Anyway, the point of all that is, it's complicated, depends on usage and surface quality, and it's why proper race cars have a lot of adjustment and will even completely swap out springs and dampers when going from one track to another. One track might be smooth, and so even if it is a fast track there won't be rapid load input. Another track might be as rough as guts, or it might have a couple of sets of tight esses on it that require the car to heave from side to side. The rates at which loads get fed in will be different on those two tracks and probably require completely different setup. Three paragraphs and 400 words are nowhere near enough to convey how complicated this subject is and also I am nowhere near the right person to write a treatise on it, as it it not my field of expertise, or even keen interest. There are many books written on the topic, and as alluded to previously, they take differing approaches to accepting the compromises involved. So you can't read just one and think you understand.
    • Personally, i'd be dropping the extra $400 for the Pro series. I believe (at least during their original conception) they were based off the Blue series but have evolved with apparent new valving tech etc etc.  The BC's were super harsh ride wise, felt like the road was covered in potholes almost (this with damping at softest), but they did feel a bit more pointy initially through corners, i felt like there was considerably more understeer at turn in on tighter radius corners (but this is not really a like or like, considering the difference in wheel size, tyre choice, track temp etc etc) 
    • Facts but it's okay I've ordered a new ignitor based on GTSBoy's confidence. In the meantime I did the ole jiggle tap on the maf connector with no change. Seems like the warmer it gets outside the worse the issues get. Hoping it's the ignitor. Also going to pick up some carb cleaner and try to get that iacv cleaned out real good. I'll report back once I've gathered more data. I really appreciate the feedback though guys keep it coming. Trying to learn everything I can about this car want to keep this thing for a long time.
×
×
  • Create New...