All I was doing there was setting the facts straigtht - the only R33 you have officially raced you got beaten by, and the R34 did an ok job considering how few mods it had relative to you given it won the first race - you both had the poor traction disadvantage to contend with. The difference in mods thing (in favour of the R33) is part of my point, you said yours is faster than most of the 33s around - all of those are a lot more stock than yours, and yours is also quicker than the equivalent r32s.... it was a pointless comment.
Also, the GTSt that ran low 12s - you said in your post low 11s (so even if you were told high 11s, you were twisting facts), and ask him yourself why he was using the NOS - and he was using NOS all the way from what I remember him saying. Ask him yourself, he posts as Trust Dunn on Skyline forums.
I didn't realise you already had a RB25DET crank - if you do, then I the 2.2 idea sounds very cool.... if you don't (the only RB25 cranks I know of at your place belong to Mark and Jeff)... I'd considering the RB26 crank, as you dislike Rb25s so much - and given the amount of work you'd have to do etc, a 2.4 would be a lot more rewarding. You can borrow my HPI mag on their build up ideas of an RB24DET (rb20det based) - basically in concept the RB24 would be at least as torquey as an RB25, and still be based on the RB20DET block- so you get your cake and eat it too