Ziller
-
Posts
374 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Gallery
Media Demo
Store
Posts posted by Ziller
-
-
My engine builder built one of the first 1,000hp Rb26 engines in Aust many years ago using a OEM head gaskit with no issues.
I normally use Tomei but the builder insisted on OEM for his own reasons, 21 psi and 3 years later haven't had a problem.
-
It seems that my rant against journos was most timely.
A survey on what federal party that ABC journos would vote for, revealed today...
40% vote for Greens
31% vote for Labor
15% vote for LNP
Flagrantly incongruous with AC Nielsen, Morgan; even with Newspoll.
No need to worry Terry, with Rineharts media influence, the low rating Bolt Report (friend and ally) will be granted extra airtime to even up the score a bit.
-
I see the brain washing Minning ads have hit the airways again, It would be nice if someone like Clive Palmer built his scaled down version of Titanic in Australia and put something back into the country he's made Billions from.
Don't worry, there will be plenty of guest worker's in the future to make them all happy aswell, try get a job now and you will see.
Yep! we all eat out of the same tuckerbox.
-
To put it simply, people these days have more choice and tend to break away from what was once traditional.
Down the track in diffrent times they could make some sort of a come back, after all they are an Aussie icon!
-
no, it is not a pain. and, the muffler is not the lowest point on the exhaust.
Like myself and many others, the OP is using two custom 3.5" mufflers on a 3.5" system. "Add in a muffler" as in mid muffler, it becomes a pain in the ass for legal hight. 4" becomes a total pain in the ass.
I hope this clears things up.
-
Pipe uses ID nominal bore measurements which is N/A for an exhaust, tube and exhaust tube is measured by the OD.
3.5" tube will be fine, 4" is a pain in the ass for ground clearance when you add in a muffler.
-
I had the same Nizmo front pipes (sorry I sold them) with stock dumps on a stock unopened motor with a couple of turbo's, 332rwkw, Mid 11s
-
The only way it could've been more painful for Abbott is if Ms Sales wore the strap on.
His ass was the only thing that was not on offer when he was begging Tony Windsor for his vote, Ms Sales would be in for a fearsome fight to make this possible.
-
My triple plate Exedy was far to brutal for the street and a standard gearbox, stalling all the time and it had way to much bite.
I smashed 3rd gear on a low tune setting the very first time I gave it some stick, I'm now running a Nizmo coppermix and its like driving a different car.
-
So you hate liars do you?, it touchers your moral fiber does it?
Oh i'm going to have me some fun fun fun if Abbott gets in.
-
I removed my Motec M800 and all the goodies and replaced it with my old Pfc and Nizmo AFM's.
The only difference I noticed was that the car started easier with the Pfc lol....
-
I wouldn't try to justify your obvious pain on this matter to others on here, run with what you know is right.
Yes you do need to have everything listed on your receipts and there is a lesson to be learnt, it may not say OS Giken but it dosn't say PAR either.
I don't know what kind of a person you are but I would confront him big time! F##k court, if there's no honey, getting very nasty is the only time I've had any success on these matters. Sad but true.
-
Does a sociologist really have to join the dots for a political scientist???
And we're talking about people's lives here; with less concern for those who already can pay the going rate to jump the queue.
The vicious circle we're caught up in now, can be easily broken. Go figure!
Go figuer what? I figuer we have three political party's here, two with an off shore and one with an on shore processing policy, Labor made some concessions which includes Nauru, as for the other two party's, nothing!
Should humble pie not sit under the noses of the Greens and the Libs aswell?
Or is this just a pointless debate based on political ideology and ugly politics.
-
+2
If Labor cannot eat humble pie and revert back to offshore processing at Nauru and the "Pacific Solution", they should at least...
fly every 200 boat people from Indonsia say, to a UN refugee camp to be placed at the end of the queue and bring back 200 who have already been processed at the front!!!
Which UN refugee camp do you suggest?
Nauru? If Tony told you that it should be Malaysia then you would be banging that drum no doubt!
Wreaking ball politics will not solve this problem, its ugly.
-
I still can't see what all the fuss and fear is about, the guts of the science world agree that we've got a bit of a problem here!
We are lacking balls in this country, to do nothing will show what a weak lot we are down the track. In many ways.
-
Let's not pretend that "independant" scientists don't have their own vested interests at heart; share of the spotlight and obtaining funding for their research etc.
On the world stage, you have experts from all over the place disagreeing on the topic...so no one can really say that anything is irrefutable. I guess where I sit, is on the suggestion that...short of the tax hike (which I do believe will have SFA effect on any contribution we have towards global warming)...I see no harm in going a little out of our way "just in case" the tree huggers are right on this one. I believe the saying is "better safe than sorry".
"better safe than sorry" same here!
-
Yeah say greenhouse again.
In recent news.
Looks like the RET is going to get a hammering, the Greens are on the way down. Gillard slides lower in approval ratings while Abbott goes up.
the MRRT will be overturned when the Coalition inevitably wins the next election, BHP is getting ready to bring some more massive projects online.
Oh and Labors border protection policy is doomed to fail
All great news really.
If the RET gets hammered so will the invesment in technology that goes along with it.
Mining companys have been paying royalties to the states, as the price of our none replacable minerals have gone through the roof the royalties have not keeped in line with the huge profits, these companys are paying less that half their profit royalties that they where paying 10 years ago, hent's the MRRT.
-
Yeah! and Carlton are shit too, those dirty rat's just pumped Collingwood damn it!
I'm just having a laugh here, where did this train run off the tracks?
I ask a simple question and all I get is unrelated analogies and waffle, if there's no viable alternative's floating around out there, I think it's leaving it a bit too late.
If anyone thinks the answer is let's do nothing, it would be easier to just say so.
-
Ziller, have you made a post in this thread yet that doesn't refer to or fall back on Tony Abbott? It's a bit deflective, is all...
Its best that you go back and have a look yourself if this is what interest you.
-
given labor's somewhat ordinary past of copying policies and passing it off as their own, my guess is that abbott won't lay his cards on the table until the last minute so that labor doesn't do the old copy/paste job and go into the election saying "look at the changes we have made to the ETS.
Abbott dosn't support an ETS lol... So we already know thats not the reason.
So with all this carbon tax shit canning there's no alternative policy in sight that we can poke and prod at?
Without an alternative a debate becomes benign.
-
I think what Dale is getting at, is that relative value for the carbon tax in actual carbon emission reductions, is low.
I think Abbott's refusal to lay his cards on the table on his climate change action plan should give you some indication in regards of relative value. Why? Because its not cost affective and wont work in reducucing the 5% of carbon emissions by 2020.
What Dale is not saying is that by 2015 the carbon tax will convert to an ETS, this is what the Chinese aim to achive by 2015.
Anyone who thinks there is no allowences or insentives comming from the carbon tax for clean energy technology is sadly misinformed, look it up, its on the public record, try www.cleanenergyfuture.gov.au under Apendix B, its all laid out for you.
Rants just dont cut it, nether does "I'm going to ban this toxic carbon tax" is that it? Is that his policy? Is this what he's going to take to the next election? how pathetic of him!
If your going to shit can a policy you have to have an alternative policy, were is Tony's? who can speak on behalf of it an explain it?
I never seem to get an answer on this, I wonder why?
-
The carbon tax and it's positive influence on climate is equated to the magnitude of the Snowy River Scheme, says our Julia.
Another delusional comment.
What is Abbott offering us, is its for free? How does it all work?
It would be nice to hear somthing different from you.
-
issue with the carbon tax:
1. Julia said she wouldnt bring it in, only to turn around and bring it in after the election. This alone should see her and labour our of parliment. This in my opinion is the biggest underlying issue around. How can our leaders propose what they plan to bring in during their term and what they wont bring in only to renig?
2. Leading scientist in the debate about carbon, global warming etc have already said it wont do anything. The bigger countries like China need to jump on board for the effect to be noticed.
3. If you want to compare the carbon tax to GST I will put it to you simply. The Liberals took the GST to a vote and let the people decide if it should come in or not. GST was voted in. Hell labour even tried to base one of their election campaigns on the promise of getting rid of the GST and they lost.
China has jumped on board with a with a pilot emissions tradeing scheme and other countries are doing more now than you may think, its just not reaching us in the current political climate with all these slanging matches at the moment.
Abbotts action plan what ever it is! wont come for free, it will be funded by the tax payer.
If its going to be funded by us, what, policies, economical data, science and evidence has he got to show that it will be both affective in reducing carbon emissions and economically cost effective in dollar terms? Both partys have commited to a 5% reduction by 2020.
I've heard the same Gillard story over and over again, what I haven't heard is any discussion on the Abbott solution.
-
You can underline and bold all you like but that doesn't change the fact that out of a total tax take of near $400b, $8b is not a lot. It's 2% not a lot. If you got a 2% pay raise next year you'd probably be pissed off that it was so small. I know I would.
Do you know the GST will raise over $53b in the 11-12 financial year? That's a far bigger impost than the CO2 tax. Did the world implode when it was introduced?
I believe the GST hit us harder than what the carbon tax will.
Fair enough in my book if people feel unhappy they didn't vote for a carbon tax but this is somthing that will not go away as a globle issue and will regain momentum. World leaders have already agreed that a carbon tax provides the best bang for buck as far as tackling carbon emissions
.
Beyond Abbott and Gillard we as a country will still have to deal with this weather we like it or not and 2020 is not too far away, Abbotts says he's going to plant trees to address the problem, this is embarrassing and wont work, whats the rest of his plan?
Who has knowledge of it? Whats the alternative plan and how is it going to operate and be funded? I think this is a more than reasonable question for anyone to ask.
Kevin Rudd Vs. Julia Gilard.
in News & Current Affairs
Posted
If you want a real laugh, watch some of these Phoney Tony video's.
You get to see the imbercile in full flight, cringe factor overload!