Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have put a deposit down on a 1996 Series 2 GTS-T. I currently am in the process of organising RACV checks etc, etc..

There is a couple of things that are worrying me a bit though. The car has a turbo, 5 stud rotors and GTS-T brakes but I found it a little odd that the speedo cluster had no stock boost gauge, the GT badges on the side of the car are blue and the car had no HICAS.

Does this seem normal? I mean the car drives fine and is in pretty good condition but are these features (or lack of) normal in a GTS-T? I am a bit concerned the car was originally an non turbo converted to a turbo. Any S2 experts which could help me on this?

I am going to contact the owners to get the VIN number so I can run it through the FAST software.

Otherwise, anyone with thoughts on this?

Thanks

-patrick

Edited by syphex

being a converted job doesn't necessarily mean it's dodgy.

you sure it has no hicas? i was pretty sure all skylines, be it turbs or non turbs had hicas.

maybe the cluster was changed for some odd reason .. could be a million things...

blue and white badges usually come only on non turbo's. check the blue enigine plate thing on the firwall engine number should say rb25detxxxx if it was born a turbo. other engine number will be rb25dexxxx.

best bet is to get the VIN....then you wont have to second guess everything. also, as for the blue badges, u can buy those on ebay, and i rekin they look better than the red 1's, on say, a white car...

Ok, after checking the VIN number it is clear that the car was originally a non-turbo but has had an engine transplant and the hubs and brakes upgraded.

From this experience I have learnt the following:

- Blue badge = N/A (Easy to change though)

- All turbo series 2 R33's come with HICAS standard and a stock boost gauge in the cluster. (some N/A's did come out without HICAS)

- DON'T buy a car (or at least a skyline) before checking the VIN number.

Now, although the car drove fine I don't know how old the engine is, whether it has an N/A or turbo gearbox or whether the brake conversion has been done properly (i.e. engineered).

Thanks for everyone's input.

The search continues....

-patrick

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Omg Brake pedal removal.. FML!!
    • I mean, I can confirm the TPS is at 100%.... I can confirm when we installed the TB and setup the cable that the TB was indeed fully open at max pedal travel.. the same 'curve' (WRT MAP vs MAP) existed with the previous setup/TB/manifold as well... No, we did not do a run with no intake connected. I would love to go back in time to do such a run to rule out the intake. It would have also been good to do a run with the airbox lid off. There's a test there where increased IAT vs more available air could be a positive tradeoff. I remember taking the lid off my R34 Turbo setup back in the day and noticing a monster increase, even if IAT's did go up. Could be similar. Hard to test unless I find a very deserted road. 
    • That's actually encouraging to be honest. my motor was rebuild many years ago but it's probably done less than 30,000kms and fucc all limiter or drift, majority street / drag / roll racing. It'll be fine 💪🏼 I don't even have lines or a can for the cam breathers installed yet, there is zero oil residue or splatter on or around them, it drives beautifully so it seems healthy. Just a ticky lifter, yet they're almost brand new oem genuine Nissan and haven't done many kms at all...
    • Have you confirmed the throttle body goes to WOT (and stays there) during the run?
    • I'm having a problem. I think it was mentioned above somewhere but can't see it.  I'm stuck in the cycle of, sand, filler, low spot again, put filler, sand, low spot again, now i put filler again and a thicker portion which seems to have helped but I got low spots in other areas. In the image. Circled in red thats where the original low spot was and the shape is the same as the red out line. I've more or less fixed that (still low spot up the top but now I have low spots where the green circled part is.  Is likely the issue that I didn't start with a course sand paper? I sanded the filler with 240 to reduce the risk of not going to far but maybe the issue is that I'm only taking off enough material to remove some of the filler but not the high spots. I now started sanding with 120 and I think I'm seeing a difference. I did fix one dent the other 2 are f**ked and seems like I made another low spot which is indicated by the furthest green circle on the left handside. Any thoughts and solutions?   Also second image. All of these rock chips, can they be filled in with primer or do i need to fill them all with filler/putty? So many rock chips on mine lol.
×
×
  • Create New...