Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

haha...you have no business in any of the shit i give ula. me and him do it for a laugh (ie i was replying to him until you jumped in - but its been fun having a go at you. coz thats all your good for, really.

btw: look at the quote below your avatar

just managed to quote it again, didn't you?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-163353
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

<<< hands legal documents to poyz obtained from high court to bring him back to reality saying that his pulsar is and wont be the fastest car ever in the world, and to remind him that if they r the greatest thing ever made there would be a pulsar forum where he would mumble on about how good it is>>>

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-163365
Share on other sites

hmm..... a bit off topic methinks.....

inasnt... i dont know why you keep jumping in but what me and poyz talk about is between us... meaning no one else understands... which is also means anyone that butts in doesn't have a clue what we are on about.... you understand it yet? :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-163871
Share on other sites

It's quite obvious that a standard GTi-R is quicker than a standard GTS-t. I don't need to re-enforce that.

And about this mods thing. That's the entire point. Everyone here bought their cars to make it quicker (well maybe a large proportion - not everyone can afford more mods) And all you seem to do is paint your interior blue.

Btw: I don't know about you, but I consider it significant that a GTi-R can out quick a GTR. Considering it's a smaller/less powerful car from factory. Kinda like a Datto 1600 running low 12's all days. That's a freaking acheivment. Does that mean this Datto can't go on about beating a stock GTR?

P.S I might see you at that dyno day. I'll have a chuckle at your interior then since I'll see in in person. :lol:

Originally posted by INASNT

<<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-164357
Share on other sites

Attached below is the dyno graph for a rb20det fitted with the TSI engine management system. The car had 440cc GTR Injectors and an rb25det afm which was quite a combination to overcome with the standard ecu. As you can see, the TSI did a good job in handling fuel and ignition duties at the 19psi required to make the power on the graph. The tune was very conservative as with all our street tunes and there was more power to be had if we pushed the timing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-172686
Share on other sites

The shootout mode is there for the sake of obtaining consistent results in different atmospheric conditions and for cars of different drivetrains. If the correct inertial settings for each car are entered then the power reading will not be inflated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-178544
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Ustasa

The shootout mode is there for the sake of obtaining consistent results in different atmospheric conditions and for cars of different drivetrains. If the correct inertial settings for each car are entered then the power reading will not be inflated.

so shootout mode aint 100% accurate then.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-179012
Share on other sites

question if a get a power chip, what exact features does it optimize

i cant tell you what it does on an rb25 unless someone loans me the ecu for a day....

but i have compared an image on the rb30 and all it changed was advancing certain spots on the ignition advance map and changes to two constants (rev limiting i think - since they advertised that rev limiting was increased on the vl/r31)

there were no changes to the fuel maps or anything else. from what I understand the AFC will alter the signals to the ECU with determing the Voltage Quanitifier map from the AFM. i dont know what else it does without looking into it further

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/3/#findComment-180557
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...