Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yes.. i would say it is your company..

not sounding harsh.. but having gone through the uni thing, trying to find a full time job.. it's alot harder than people think..

as for where else - I wouldn't bother with going to schools.. go to a job site either seek or careerone - that way atleast you'll get someone who is a) computer literate and B) hopefully interested in the job rather than doing it for the sake of applying (which alot of school people do..)

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Jeez, talk about a hot thread.

It's an office junior job. Photocopy, fax, take this here, go there and get this, a little bit of phone answering when receptionist is at lunch, scratch my back, a little to the left, get me a drink, fill the dishwasher, go and find one of these and buy it.

I was thinking around $23-26k to start with but could go either way depending. Just interested to see what's out there.

Mate, that sounds about right for the role....

as links said, post it up on seek or contact a recruitment agency,

only problem with a recruitment agency is that you may have to pay them a commission based on the salary of the employee..

eg. 6 percent of the employees income..

but with the agency they do all the b.s. work. kinda know from previous experience when hiring some for a contract.

I think your probably on the money.. are you going to go full time or casual..

really.. that requires no real skill.. just the will to stick around hahahaha.. sorry..

anyways.. yeah.. you don't need anyone to special - i'd go for a chick as they tend to be a bit better at answering phones I guess

a gopher - no more than $25k and being 17-18 yrs without qualification is pretty damn good

Got my last guy from Seek.com, but be prepared to cop atleast 20 emails a DAY....ATLEAST.

Drove me mad at how many applications i got, but be patient, plenty of people who are fresh off the boat people trying to get a job out there & plenty of people who bullshit about what they can do.

thats my experience with job seekers.

The technical term for that position is "Office Shit-Kicker" I believe :)

Now that the role has been revealed, I think the salary is correct. At least the DEO actually has to do something and has actual responsibilities!!!

im in the wrong industry :P:D:D

its not too much of a popular site - have you tried www.gumtree.com.au might get some poeple looking there- however mostly work holiday people.

My last job was found on careerone.com.au

I'm in North Shore. Just let people know you're on SAU and they'll come running. Beats working for an old woman like myself. Anyways goodluck with the search and anywhere between 23-26k is fair for an inexperienced school leaver.

I don't know anyone who gets this but it is lower than $5.50

I used to get $4.60/hr when working at KFC.. than I got a $0.13 pay rise.. I quit the following week after 3 months..

I was 15..

anyways.. yeah.. you'll have fun with seek..

Jeez, talk about a hot thread.

It's an office junior job.  Photocopy, fax, take this here, go there and get this, a little bit of phone answering when receptionist is at lunch, scratch my back, a little to the left, get me a drink, fill the dishwasher, go and find one of these and buy it.

I was thinking around $23-26k to start with but could go either way depending.  Just interested to see what's out there.

christ i'd be happy with that

then again i look like a bastard and probably sound like one too :rofl:

i'm only on like $12.35 an hour too =/

Hold on, I work in the public service and I don't earn 50k...

I think my area of the public service is the most lowly-paid of all of them (seriously!)

Oh yeah, and you're right about the lack of job satisfaction! :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...